{"id":104,"date":"2015-07-28T23:24:51","date_gmt":"2015-07-28T23:24:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scscsussex.wordpress.com\/?p=104"},"modified":"2015-07-28T23:24:51","modified_gmt":"2015-07-28T23:24:51","slug":"cameron-goes-big-on-anti-corruption-but-is-the-devil-in-the-detail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/2015\/07\/28\/cameron-goes-big-on-anti-corruption-but-is-the-devil-in-the-detail\/","title":{"rendered":"Cameron goes big on anti-corruption, but is the devil in the detail?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On 28 July\u00a0David Cameron chose Singapore to go big on the UK government&#8217;s anti-corruption efforts. \u00a0The choice of Singapore will have been no coincidence; the late grandfather of modern Singapore, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/public-leaders-network\/2015\/apr\/04\/uk-learn-former-colony-singapore-lee-kuan-yew\">Lee Kuan Yew<\/a> turned the city-state from a place where corruption was endemic to one where a strong, vibrant anti-corruption commission, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cpib.gov.sg\">Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau<\/a>, helped transform the country develop in to a flourishing, economic success story. \u00a0When successful anti-corruption efforts are the talk of the town, the Singaporean experience normally makes more than just an honourable appearance.<\/p>\n<p>Much of what Cameron said (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/speeches\/tackling-corruption-pm-speech-in-singapore\">here<\/a>) is commendable. \u00a0His government is indeed making progress, and the 2014 National Anti-Corruption Plan (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/388894\/UKantiCorruptionPlan.pdf\">here<\/a>) provides a good framework for tackling the myriad of issues that the UK still faces. \u00a0On the specifics there is also evidence that Cameron wants to move forward; the thorny issue of the beneficial ownership of companies, for example, has been &#8211; to the surprise of many &#8211; faced down, and the UK is doing a good job in placing itself in the international vanguard in this area. \u00a0The 2010 UK Bribery Act, to take another example, is a piece of legislation that has many honourable facets. \u00a0There is subsequently mounting evidence that the UK has moved on from assuming that corruption happened in far off places about which we knew little.<\/p>\n<p>Cameron nonetheless needs to be careful that he doesn&#8217;t go overboard on the\u00a0rhetoric. \u00a0Matthew Hancock, formerly the UK&#8217;s anti-corruption champion, was largely noticeable by his absence in UK domestic politics, whilst his successor, Sir Eric Pickles, doesn&#8217;t possess a cabinet rank post. \u00a0In and of itself that need not be a major problem. \u00a0The head of the UK&#8217;s anti-corruption drive needs to be someone who has the character and dynamism to drive the agenda forward; Pickles, as even his detractors are likely to admit, has that. \u00a0But, as Robert Barrington, Head of Transparency International in the UK, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.transparency.org.uk\/rss\/12-blog\/1260-governments-new-anti-corruption-champion-exciting-appointment-or-damp-squib\/1260-governments-new-anti-corruption-champion-exciting-appointment-or-damp-squib\">perceptively noted<\/a> back in May, Pickles, as then Secretary of State at the Department of Communities and local government, was strong at taking on alleged corruption in the problematic London borough of Tower Hamlets but much less impressive when he led the way in\u00a0abolishing the audit commission &#8211; a body that had a clear and unambiguous role in revealing financial malpractice. \u00a0The fact that nothing of note replaced it was even more worrying.<\/p>\n<p>It would be easy to get too caught up in the personality politics of Westminster. \u00a0But if the UK is going to carry on the good work that this regime has started and, even more importantly, if the UK&#8217;s anti-corruption plan is going to be something that has a long-term impact, then individuals need to be empowered to complete the tasks set out in the plan. \u00a0Someone needs to have ownership of it and to stand up and be accountable for implementing it. As things stand, this isn\u2019t the case.<\/p>\n<p>Unless this happens, we will continue to see grand speeches the type of which Cameron delivered in Singapore but\u00a0frustratingly little in substantive terms. Unless someone specific is tasked with putting each of the plan&#8217;s aims\u00a0in to practice then the successes that Cameron rightly flags will remain beacons in an otherwise choppy sea. Tackling corruption requires both strategy and stickability. The UK may well have a case for saying that it could have both \u2013 but someone needs to be tasked with illustrating that that&#8217;s\u00a0the case in\u00a0practice.<\/p>\n<p>Dan Hough<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On 28 July\u00a0David Cameron chose Singapore to go big on the UK government&#8217;s anti-corruption efforts. \u00a0The choice of Singapore will have been no coincidence; the late grandfather of modern Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew turned the city-state from a place where<span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/2015\/07\/28\/cameron-goes-big-on-anti-corruption-but-is-the-devil-in-the-detail\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":359,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/359"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/centre-for-the-study-of-corruption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}