{"id":1777,"date":"2023-01-17T16:35:28","date_gmt":"2023-01-17T16:35:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/?p=1777"},"modified":"2023-01-17T16:35:31","modified_gmt":"2023-01-17T16:35:31","slug":"reflections-on-the-manchester-arena-public-inquiry-can-group-psychology-help","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2023\/01\/17\/reflections-on-the-manchester-arena-public-inquiry-can-group-psychology-help\/","title":{"rendered":"Reflections on the Manchester Arena public inquiry: Can group psychology help?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Louise Davidson <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Part Two of the public inquiry<\/a> into the Manchester Arena Attack, one of the key problems with the response on the night was that the three emergency services failed to act as one team. Instead, the Police, Fire, and Ambulance Services were working as three separate teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One aspect of the Manchester Arena Attack that distinguishes it from day-to-day emergencies (e.g., burglaries, small house fires, and heart attacks) is the required joint nature of the response by the Police, Fire, and Ambulance Service. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"an<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP)<\/a> were established following incident reports that showed persistent challenges in the ability of the emergency services to work effectively together. JESIP aims to improve joint working by providing five principles for responders to follow: co-locate; communicate; co-ordination; joint understanding of risk; and shared situational awareness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the first doctrine providing these principles being published in 2013, and the second edition being published 10 months before the attack, the <\/a>inquiry reported \u201csignificant failures in relation to each of these principles for joint working on the night of the attack\u201d (p45).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here are just some examples from the inquiry of how the JESIP principles were not met during the response:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Co-locate: <\/strong>There was no shared location which all the emergency services met. Despite a location being recorded by the Police, it was shared with the Ambulance Service but not shared with the Fire Service until more than an hour later. This shared location was not used by any agency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Communicate<\/strong>: The Police declared <\/a>Operation Plato<\/a> (the phrase used to identify a suspected marauding firearms terrorist attack which triggers a pre-determined multi-agency response), however, this was not shared with anybody outside of the Police until after the last living casualty was removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Co-ordination<\/strong>: As a terrorist attack, the Police were the lead agency in the response. Commanders from each service should have been discussing resources and the activities of each agency, as well as agreeing priorities and making joint decisions throughout the incident. A commander from the Fire Service was not present until after the last living casualty had been removed, and whilst a commander from the Ambulance Service was present, they did not make any contact with the Police commander. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joint understanding of risk<\/strong>:Rather establishing a joint understanding of risk, the three services made their own risk assessments separately and reached different conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shared situational awareness: <\/strong>Those on the scene did not record it as significant that the Fire Service were not present during the first two hours of the response. The Inquiry suggests that the reason for this was due to insufficient realisation on the part of police and ambulance of the contribution fire could have made on the night.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taken together, these failures in the emergency services to follow the JESIP principles prevented their effective joint working. A vital question that we therefore need to ask is how could the emergency services have been better prepared to jointly respond to the Manchester Arena Attack?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How can group psychology help?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the Social Identity Approach, a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 (i.e., a shared identity) between people can facilitate co-ordination and co-operation between them through increasing their psychological sense of inter-connection and common purpose. To be put more simply, a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 can improve group working.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The inquiry suggests that responders involved in the response to the attack did not share a sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 and thus did not respond as one team on the night. Yet, in my <\/a>previous research<\/a> I have found that it is possible for responders to share a sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 with each other by making salient the fact they are part of the emergency services. This was made possible through responders from different organizations providing each other with emotional and physical support, as well as them recognizing they were sharing a difficult experience with each other. In addition, I have also found that leaders can play an important role<\/a> in reinforcing a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 through ensuring common goals are communicated to all responders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Expanding on this, in one of my recent studies, we conducted discussion-based exercises with responders from the Police, Fire, and Ambulance Services from across the UK where we gave them a scenario of a major incident and asked them to discuss with each other how they would respond. We wanted to know whether or not responders\u2019 sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 was linked to improved joint working in the exercise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I found that a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 between responders in the exercise was associated with better self-reported joint working. Thus, a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 is<\/em> linked to improved joint working.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, I identified that joint working was facilitated during the exercise through understanding the roles of the other emergency services present; responders having a shared frame of reference for how they should be responding (e.g., JESIP); having a common language to communicate to each other with; and responders trusting each other. A preprint for this research will be available soon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What does this mean for future training\/preparation?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Based on my research, I argue that a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 should be an important part of a multi-agency response. I have demonstrated that a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 is linked to improved<\/em> joint working during a discussion-based exercise. Furthermore, I have identified specific factors which are linked to improved joint working. Based on this, I recommend that training and guidance needs to include basic group psychology, such as ways to harness a shared sense of \u2018us-ness\u2019 between emergency responders, in addition to the operational guidance it already includes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I hope this research allows some learning to take place and provides a positive step forward from the challenges identified from the Manchester Arena Attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Louise Davidson is a Psychology PhD student at the University of Sussex. Funded by Fire Service Research and Training Trust, Louise\u2019s research takes a social identity approach to understanding and optimizing multi-agency emergency response. Last summer, Louise took part in Soapbox Science on Brighton seafront and shared her experiences in the Blog piece, A PhD, public engagement event, and me<\/a> . If you are interested to know more about Louise\u2019s research, take a look at her latest publication<\/a> and\u00a0practitioner reports<\/em><\/a>. You can also follow Louise on Twitter\u00a0@loudavidson07<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Louise Davidson According to Part Two of the public inquiry into the Manchester Arena Attack, one of the key problems with the response on the night was that the three emergency services failed to act as one team. Instead,…<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more ›<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":373,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pafdEV-sF","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1593,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2022\/07\/05\/a-phd-public-engagement-event-and-me\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":0},"title":"A PhD, public engagement event, and me","date":"July 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"By Psychology PhD student, Louise Davidson The Science of Teamwork Teamwork is something that most of us engage in every day \u2013 for example, within a work team or a sports team. We know the members of our teams\u2026 their names, their strengths, their weaknesses, and their role within the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","img":{"alt_text":"photo of Louise Davidson in a white coat presenting to a group of people people on Brighton seafront","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2022\/07\/Picture1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":216,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2016\/06\/06\/explaining-involuntary-influence-beyond-contagion\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":1},"title":"Explaining involuntary influence: Beyond contagion","date":"June 6, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"By John Drury A recent article on the Brexit debate suggested that there is a fear among Governments that Brexit would lead to\u00a0\u2018referendum contagion\u2019. The term \u2018contagion\u2019 here denotes not only the idea of behaviour spreading rapidly, but also that this spread is uncontainable and undesirable in some way. It\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2016\/06\/Roger-1-300x229.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1166,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2020\/12\/15\/understanding-collective-fear-responses-to-perceived-terrorist-threats\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":2},"title":"Understanding collective fear responses to perceived terrorist threats","date":"December 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"By Dr Dermot Barr The UK national threat level was raised to \u2018Severe\u2019, the second highest level, on the 3rd November 2020 after a series of terrorist attacks in France and Austria. This level means an attack is thought to be \u2018highly likely\u2019. This blogpost discusses the psychology around this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Research staff"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2020\/12\/Dermots-blog-Graph-1-Evacuations-due-to-false-alarm-incidents.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1902,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2023\/03\/17\/the-brain-energy-lab-connecting-and-collaborating-is-fundamental-to-everything-we-do\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":3},"title":"The Brain Energy Lab: connecting and collaborating is fundamental to everything we do","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"By Catherine Hall The theme for this year's British Science Week is connections and we thought it would be a good opportunity to ask one of our psychology lecturers, Dr Catherine Hall to tell us some of the reasons why connections and collaborations are so important to research success. Since\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2023\/03\/BSW-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1358,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2021\/07\/13\/working-as-a-research-fellow-in-parliament\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":4},"title":"Working as a Research Fellow in Parliament","date":"July 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Our PhD student Alison Lacey was on a 13-week placement at the\u00a0Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology\u00a0(POST). POST offers Research Fellowships to approximately 30 PhD students a year from a range of science disciplines, and Alison's was funded by the British Psychological Society. As part of her fellowship, Alison was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "PhD research"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2021\/07\/Houses-of-Parliament.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1244,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/2021\/03\/25\/spirit-of-sussex-award-psychology-nominees-shannon-plant\/","url_meta":{"origin":1777,"position":5},"title":"Spirit of Sussex Award -Psychology Nominees: Shannon Plant","date":"March 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Spirit of Sussex Award (SoSA)\u00a0Connector team has been in contact with Psychology students to highlight their impressive extra-curricular activities. This month the SOSA Connector team wish to highlight the activities of Shannon Plant, a second-year Psychology with Neuroscience student.\u00a0 This is what Shannon had to tell about her activities\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/files\/2021\/03\/Case-Study-Image-1-SP-edited.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/373"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1777"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1804,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777\/revisions\/1804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/psychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}