{"id":3177,"date":"2025-05-12T08:22:32","date_gmt":"2025-05-12T08:22:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/sussexenergygroup\/?p=3177"},"modified":"2025-05-12T14:24:30","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T14:24:30","slug":"techno-optimism-alone-wont-fix-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/sussexenergygroup\/2025\/05\/12\/techno-optimism-alone-wont-fix-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Techno-optimism alone won\u2019t fix climate change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a>
Photo by Fr\u00e9 Sonneveld<\/a> on Unsplash<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This blog post was originally published by the Energy Demand Research Centre (EDRC)<\/a>, 2 May 2025, written by Professor Mari Martiskainen<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong>

Ex-prime minister Tony Blair was making headlines this week by saying that current Net Zero policies are \u2018doomed to fail\u2019. In a new report<\/a> by the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), he argues that voters \u201cfeel they\u2019re being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know the impact on global emissions is minimal\u201d. It is an unprecedented call from a former prime minister whose party has been leading climate action in the UK. I will pick up on three key points in relation to the importance of climate action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The science on climate change is clear<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

First, the science is clear. Unless we take action, climate change is going to have even more devastating impacts on our societies and the global economy. Countries such as China are seeing this as a big financial opportunity in winning the green race. The evidence on the economic prize is sound and clear: the opportunity for the UK economy is enormous relative to the impact we can have on global emissions, where green growth should be seen as this century\u2019s central opportunity for growing more equitable prosperity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People want climate action and clear government leadership<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Second, people want to take climate action, and for that they want clear leadership from government. While the TBI report questions people\u2019s willingness to undertake lifestyle choices, for example, it is clear from a host of academic and policy studies that people want to act and are ready to change, as long as they get clarity on what is expected. For example, the world\u2019s largest standalone survey on climate change by UNDP<\/a> found that 80% of people globally want their country to do more on climate change, and 72% want their country to move away from fossil fuels to clean energy quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An academic survey of 125 countries by Andre and colleagues<\/a> found that \u201c69% of the global population expresses a willingness to contribute 1% of their personal income, 86% endorse pro-climate social norms and 89% demand intensified political action.\u201d Many people have important conditions for this transition, such as it being fair. Crucial issues for policy attention include ensuring that people can have confidence on the value that their own financial commitments will deliver, privately and publicly. This means also the government committing to a genuinely \u2018just transition\u2019 in terms of jobs and delivering greener growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People must be at the centre of climate solutions<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Third, the report calls for \u2018actions for positive disruption\u2019, and by this it means accelerating and scaling technologies that capture carbon, harnessing the power of AI, investing in frontier energy solutions, and scaling nature-based solutions. The latter are very welcome, but a major focus on nuclear, carbon capture and AI relates to techno-optimism and the widely debunked approach that technology alone will fix the world\u2019s problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This approach leaves out a range of positive socio-technical approaches where people are at the centre of climate solutions. It also misses out on the numerous benefits that could be achieved by engaging citizens in the energy transition. A truly positive disruptive action would be for example to question the high-consuming lifestyles and excess energy consumption that many countries have, including some of those petrostates that TBI has worked for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also needs to recognise the opportunity that energy demand action can have in reducing emissions while also enabling a better quality of life for many. The TBI report for example claims that \u201cproposed green policies that suggest limiting meat consumption or reducing air travel have alienated many people rather than bringing them along\u201d. However, our research with people in the UK<\/a>, for example, has found that there is support for a substantial shift in diets, including reduced meat and dairy consumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Addressing climate change needs to be a joined-up, global effort. This needs trusted, robust and impartial evidence applied in a world of vested interests and misinformation. Net zero policies themselves have not become toxic for the majority, yet we should not discount people\u2019s concerns about the changes needed. Technology alone, however, is not the solution.<\/p>\nFollow Sussex Energy Group \"Facebook\"<\/a>\"twitter\"<\/a>\"linkedin\"<\/a><\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This blog post was originally published by the Energy Demand Research Centre (EDRC), 2 May 2025, written by Professor Mari Martiskainen. Ex-prime minister Tony Blair was making headlines this week by saying that current Net Zero policies are \u2018doomed to…<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more ›<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":414,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[96027,161328,161331,161329],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n