{"id":3267,"date":"2019-02-25T07:58:22","date_gmt":"2019-02-25T07:58:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/?p=3267"},"modified":"2019-02-25T07:58:22","modified_gmt":"2019-02-25T07:58:22","slug":"the-uks-continuity-trade-agreements-missing-in-inaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/2019\/02\/25\/the-uks-continuity-trade-agreements-missing-in-inaction\/","title":{"rendered":"The UK\u2019s Continuity Trade Agreements: Missing in Inaction"},"content":{"rendered":"Share this article: <\/em> \"Facebook\"<\/a>\"twitter\"<\/a>\"reddit\"<\/a>\"pinterest\"<\/a>\"linkedin\"<\/a>\"mail\"<\/a>

\"\"25 February 2019<\/em><\/p>\n

Julia Magntorn Garrett is a Research Officer in Economics at the University of Sussex and a fellow of the UK Trade Policy Observatory.<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n

Two weeks ago, the UKTPO<\/a> called for further transparency on the Government\u2019s current progress on replicating the existing agreements between the EU and third countries. On Thursday last week, Secretary of State for International Trade, Liam Fox MP made a public announcement confirming that little had changed since he gave evidence to the International Trade Select Committee on the 6\u00a0February and that the progress has been minimal. So far, only six out of the 40 existing trade agreements have been signed, covering a total of 9 countries; Chile, Faroe Islands, Switzerland, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles and Zimbabwe. One further agreement is close to being finalised, adding another 2 countries (Fiji and Papua New Guinea) to the list. This still leaves about 60 Free Trade Agreement (FTA) countries without continuity agreements.<\/p>\n

Dr Fox also announced that some agreements will definitely not be in place for exit day, those with Andorra, Japan, Turkey, and San Marino. The agreement with Algeria is also unlikely to be ready<\/a>. When it comes to numbers, the announcement is thin on details. The Department for International Trade states that the EU-FTA agreements account for 11% of the\u00a0UK\u2019s trade, a figure that seems low to start with. No further information is provided as to how important the signed countries are to the UK\u2019s trade, or how much of the UK\u2019s trade with the rest of the FTA group is still at risk if we have a hard Brexit in about a month\u2019s time. This blog aims to fill some of these gaps.<\/p>\n

The 11% figure is based on ONS data for the year to end September 2018. Interestingly, the figure excludes Turkey, San Marino, Andorra and Japan, precisely the countries which Dr Fox confirmed will not have agreements ready for 29 March 2019. Including these four countries brings the total figure to over 14% of the UK\u2019s trade. Using a slightly different data source (UN Comtrade), though still based on official UK data, the average share of these countries\u00a0in the UK\u2019s total goods trade (2015-2017) is over 14% for imports and 15% of exports. These statistics\u00a0exclude Japan, as the EU-Japan FTA only came into force on 1 February 2019.[1]\u00a0<\/a>Further, while these figures represent the total across all industries, for some industries and firms the FTA group accounts for a much larger share of trade.<\/p>\n

Table 1: UK\u2019s total trade with the FTA group (imports + exports)<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Using the ONS data again, but now only looking at goods, shows that the nine countries with which trade agreements have been signed account for around 2.2% of UK\u2019s total goods trade (imports + exports) and 15.3% of UK\u2019s total trade with the FTA group (including Japan), or 17.7% of UK\u2019s trade with the FTA partners excluding Japan. This means that, at present, around 80% of the UK\u2019s goods trade with the FTA group is still at risk come 29\u00a0March.\u00a0<\/strong>The four countries which we have been informed will not have agreements ready by this date account for 3.8% of the\u00a0UK\u2019s total trade, a larger share than those that have been agreed. Excluding Japan from the former group (where the UK has traded without preferential access up until 1\u00a0February this year) brings this share down to around 1.8% of the UK\u2019s total trade and 14.6% of the UK\u2019s EU-FTA trade.<\/p>\n

Table 2: Trade impacted by agreements signed and those not possible to sign by exit\u00a0date<\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

We welcome the release of this information, but the public has a right to know the reality of the situation we are now in. The full list of countries which the UK currently has trade agreements with (through its membership of the EU) account for at least 14% of the UK\u2019s trade, not 11% as stated by the Government. The agreements that the Government has managed to replicate so far only account for a relatively small share of this.<\/p>\n

Any agreement has to be laid before parliament for 21 sitting days before being ratified. After today, there remain only 21 sitting days until the day the UK is set to leave the EU. The alternative to the 21 days is \u2018provisional application’ but – both from the UK\u2019s legal perspective and that of partner countries\u2019 – that is not straightforward. If no further advances are made in rolling over the remaining agreements, the majority of the UK\u2019s trade with the FTA group risks losing the preferences that companies are currently relying on. Come 29 March 2019, ‘Global Britain’\u00a0<\/em>might find itself not so global at all.<\/p>\n

<\/h4>\n

Footnote<\/h4>\n

[1]<\/a>See the UKTPO\u2019s latest blog post on the topic<\/a>, which uses data from Comtrade for the period 2015-2017. This blog uses a different data source and therefore some numbers in this blog differ from numbers reported in the earlier blog.<\/p>\n

Disclaimer:<\/em>
\nThe opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the University of Sussex or UK Trade Policy Observatory.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Republishing guidelines:<\/em>
\nThe UK Trade Policy Observatory\u00a0believes in the free flow of information and encourages readers to cite our materials, providing due acknowledgement.\u00a0For online use, this should be a link to the original resource on our website. We do not publish under a Creative Commons\u00a0license. This means you CANNOT republish our articles online or in print for free.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Share this article: 25 February 2019 Julia Magntorn Garrett is a Research Officer in Economics at the University of Sussex and a fellow of the UK Trade Policy Observatory. Two weeks ago, the UKTPO called for further transparency on the Government\u2019s current progress on replicating the existing agreements between the EU and third countries. On Thursday last week, Secretary of State for International Trade, Liam Fox MP made a public announcement confirming that little had changed since he gave evidence to the International Trade Select Committee on the 6\u00a0February and that the progress has been minimal. So far, only six out of the 40 existing trade agreements have been signed, covering a total of 9 countries; Chile, Faroe Islands, Switzerland, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles and Zimbabwe. One further agreement is close to being finalised, adding another 2 countries (Fiji and Papua New Guinea) to the list. This still… Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":213,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[129970],"tags":[147861,147956,123637,123634,147955],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3267"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3267"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3267\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3275,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3267\/revisions\/3275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sussex.ac.uk\/uktpo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}