“What I wish I knew before starting my PG course…”

Zoe Hopkins: “I did the Experimental Psychology (EP) MSc, since my undergraduate degree was not in psychology. My year as an EP MSc student was very demanding – I never felt like I’d manage all the work I needed to do. As it happens, I did manage to get things done, and if I’ve one piece of advice for postgraduates on the EP MSc, it’s this: never be afraid to take time away from the course. Time out is time well spent: it gives you a chance to relax and recharge, and also gives your brain a chance to synthesise all the information you’ll be taking in from your studies.”

Shengyu Yang: “1. If you would like to read PhD right after the MSc course, you had better contact the potential supervisor as soon as possible. During the third term of your MSc study, you can already prepare the relevant proposal and go with the application process. 2. There are gatherings for postgraduate students in the school of psychology at regular intervals. It is fun and helpful for you to meet new friends and talk about your study and life.”

PG Mentors

Amy Smith: “Having completed an MSc, my biggest piece of advice for MSc, MRes and PG students is to have fun with it, and don’t worry about making mistakes! Nobody on your course has all of the answers – if they did, they’d be the supervisors already (and even then, supervisors don’t have it all figured out). At PG level, we’re all still learning, and we tend to be our own worst critics. Give yourself room for error – because each problem is a learning experience.”

Philine Harris: “One thing that I only realised during my PhD is how valuable you as a research student are to your supervisor. Your work is as important to you as it is to them and they are grateful for your contribution to their area of research. Never worry about troubling them for their time – I was worried I might be getting on my supervisor’s nerves with my silly little MSc project, when I actually now realise how much all supervisors value the work of any student doing research with them. Another thing that I wish I knew when I was doing my MSc was the power and the value of asking for help. If you’re stuck (whether doing research for your project or work on the taught modules), ask around for help. Start with your supervisor or academic advisor or lecturer, and if they don’t know, they’ll point you to someone who will. It’s much quicker than trying to find the answer yourself and you’ll network along the way as most people are flattered when someone approaches them for help!”

 Vlad Costin: “Don’t be afraid to express opinions during seminars. Doing an MSc usually means that you are taught in smaller groups and you will often have more seminars than in your undergrad. The more you put in, the more you get. There is no reason to feel intimidated. The lecturers or tutors leading the seminars are almost always very nice and enthusiastic about students who are ‘brave’ enough to question the ideas discussed. Expressing half-baked opinions and learning how to get better at thinking critically helped me a lot.”

 

Are you interested in doing one of our Masters? Come to the Open Day this Wednesday and talk to the convenors and current students. We will be in Pevensey 1, Lecture Theatre 1A7 and in room 1A1 from 2:45-4pm.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

The Bird Lab in the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting

By Christiane Oedekoven

In the Episodic Memory Group (also known as the Bird lab, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/psychology/memory), we are interested in how people remember events and how that is reflected in underlying brain functions.

From left to right, Dr Chris Bird, Dr Sam Berens and Christiane

From left to right, Dr Chris Bird, Dr Sam Berens and Dr Christiane Oedekoven

During our recent visit to the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Chicago, the Bird lab met about 28,897 fellow neuroscientists. We spent 5 days looking at a fraction of the 14,000 posters on site and enjoyed various talks on new developments in the field. We were especially excited by a symposium on multivariate pattern analysis in medial temporal lobe. One study showed that people hearing the storyline of a video they never saw, showed similar brain activation to people that had actually seen the video…believe it or not. It seems like current neuroimaging research in memory is moving more and more towards pattern analysis. But still, very few groups work with videos as memory stimuli in the MRI scanner, like we do.

There was a huge interest in our two posters, which Sam Berens and I presented in one long morning session. As the morning progressed, we had clusters of people in front of our posters who wanted to hear everything about how “Configural learning engages the semantic memory system but generalisation involves the hippocampus” and “Stable representations of lifelike events over the course of one week”. The poster session is 4 hours long and it was taking its toll, by the end we were both very hoarse. In my poster I discussed a kind of memory signature. When people remember a video immediately and a week later, there is a stable pattern of brain activation that is specific to the memory.

Despite the fact that there are many thousands of people in the convention centre (apparently this conference can only be held in a small number of venues, as most are not big enough) we saw quite a few people coincidentally, meeting up with old colleagues and making new acquaintances. We also met

Eisuke Koya and Joe Ziminski (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/psychology/koyaensemblelab), who also presented a poster.

Overall, it is definitely a conference worth going to, the sheer size is impressive, the scope, and it is a fantastic opportunity to see the latest advances in the field.

Find out more about our research on Cognitive Psychology.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

My placement year at GlaxoSmithKline

By Lauren Maddock

 

I did not begin my degree with the intention to complete a Placement year but decided during my second year that it would be a great development opportunity whilst also trialling a career area I was interested in. I am a Psychology undergraduate and so felt that a HR programme would best align to my degree and specifically my career aspirations. I began researching which companies offered Industrial Placement (IP) programmes and completed online applications for the top three that I felt best aligned to my values and what I wanted from a placement.

Lauren Maddock

Lauren Maddock

The online applications were all fairly similar, typically including basic information about you and your education history, your CV and long (500ish words) answer questions about why you want to apply and how your degree relates to the programme. If the application form was successful you may be asked to complete short online tests that assess numeracy skills and verbal reasoning. Fortunately these went well and I was later invited to attend an Assessment Centre at GSK. A week prior we were sent a problem to solve and instructions to prepare a presentation on our solution. On the day we were given some information about the programme and a tour of the building before having a competency based interview and doing the presentations. Regardless of the outcome, attending days like this are a great chance to build confidence and may help prepare you for any future interviews.

I began my placement in June 2015 and am working as a HR IP student embedded in the Global Finance Capabilities team at GSK in Brentford. Primarily, we identify essential capabilities for Finance and design, propose and implement various development offerings to improve these. My role involves

supporting the various technical and behavioural development opportunities we have for Finance, including Self-Assessment tools and module webinars. I am also working with the team to create a new offering which is being designed in response to an ask for more technical support, identified in our global survey. In addition, I create quarterly newsletters for the 3000+ global Finance employees and also more informal audio blogs/ videos to give the population regular updates.

Outside of my role I have also volunteered with Talent Recruitment teams, an area I am particularly interested in, helping to prepare and facilitate various graduate Assessment Centres. It has been really interesting learning about what goes on behind the scenes for these events and what measures the candidates are assessed against. Additionally, I work with the communications team for IP Unite, a student run community that simply unites IPs across the UK sites. Within this I lead a sub-team which has helped develop my leadership and delegation skills. There are also regular ‘lunch and learn’ sessions which introduce the different areas of HR in GSK. These have really opened my eyes to the breadth of opportunity within Human

GSK Building

GSK Building

Resources and made me excited to start exploring future career options in this space. I have also volunteered with some of GSK’s external charity partners on a number of various events. These include working with charity Spark! in local schools running mock interviews and networking events with young people and supporting the launch event for GSK’s new partnership with Comic Relief.

My HR placement at GSK has been an incredible experience. I have been able to develop key business skills, network with industry professionals and gain a breadth of HR and business knowledge. The opportunity has elevated my employability and given me the confidence and motivation to exploit my full potential. I would definitely recommend a placement to anyone who is keen to stretch themselves and is looking for both professional and personal development.

 

If you would like to find out more about placements for 2nd year students and how to apply, please come to the placement talk on Wednesday 3 February in the lecture theatre of Chichester 1 at 3pm. Sussex Partnership Trust Reps and current psychology students in placements will be answering questions.

The Career & Employability Centre has also a placement preparation programme. For more information go to the placements’ webpage

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Clara Wilson’s JRA experience

Even before I was aware of the JRA scheme I was keen to help out on projects done by the Mammal Vocal Communication and Cognition Research Group at Sussex. The work I was most interested in concerned the cognitive abilities of horses – an area that the team has done extensive research into already. The JRA provided the perfect opportunity to be fully integrated into this group and get a real taste of what doing a Masters or PhD would be like. The application for the scheme required a research proposal. Learning this skill is vital if I am to undertake future research so it was beneficial to practice this procedure. My supervisor Karen McComb was enormously helpful throughout this process, giving me great tips on how to write a concise and thorough proposal.

As someone who has always been hugely interested in animals, and spent many years around horses, the opportunity to combine horse behaviour with psychological insights fascinated me. The main focus of my JRA was a study aiming to test domestic horses’ abilities to interpret, recall, and respond appropriately to human facial expressions. This type of research aims to investigate whether domestic horses’ have adapted advanced socio-cognitive skills that may have facilitated their integration among humans. We presented horses with either happy or angry photographs of a human face, then three hours later presented them with the actual person who had been previously shown in the picture. In the second phase, a heart rate monitor was used to record whether heart rate variability changed in response to the stimuli. This variable provided a more subtle response measure that is not accessible from observation alone.

Screen Shot 2015-12-07 at 15.34.46

In these experiments I had the role of horse handler, which meant that I was responsible for positioning the horse correctly and using the heart rate watch to create laps, marking each stage of the test. It was great to be able to spend time around horses whilst simultaneously implementing experimental controls to produce a standardized procedure. Having worked on these trials I have been gained an awareness of how much time and effort it requires from multiple people just to make sure that everyone is in the right place at the right time with all the right equipment! This has been important to me as I am going on to complete my third year project with this group and now have a much better understanding of what kind of methods are feasible in the amount of time I have. The process also showed me that most of your time is eaten up, not by the data collection itself, but by the coding and analyzing of the data. From a two minute video clip of behavior it may take anywhere from an hour to three hours to code all the behaviours! With this in mind I can now plan my upcoming research to allow more than enough time for the coding, which is something I would not have considered had I not been doing it first hand.

The results of this study were very encouraging and contribute to a wider understanding of the horse-human relationship. Research such as this is important as it provides insight into the evolutionary history of communication mechanisms between horses and humans, but also looks at the universality of emotional expression and perception across species.

Throughout the JRA, and especially since the trials for the ‘Memory for Emotion’ study ended, I have been assisting with collection of social data as part of a wider project that the team is working on. This has been really enjoyable as we code horses’ natural behaviour in herds. To ensure we observe the horses with their whole social group we often need to arrive very early in the morning or stay late in the evening. It is a testament to those on the research team who have been collecting this data for a year already, as we are often out for hours in the rain watching intently for some interactions to take place! This kind of data collection has provided some of the highlights of my JRA experience, as the horses have so much character and have provided countless entertaining situations to observe. The hours of data collected comes with substantial computer work once you get back in the office (let’s just say my Excel skills have improved substantially over the last eight weeks!). Taking part in this type of data collection has taught me many key skills such as using a coding scheme, observation in the field, using tablets to collect data, editing the data in the office and finally processing it into a useful profile for each horse. As part of the scheme I was assigned a ‘mentor’ – Kate Grounds. She was invaluable throughout the whole process, spending hours teaching me all the mentioned skills both out in the field and in the office. It was great to feel so supported not only by Kate but also my supervisor Karen McComb and the other members of the team, Leanne Proops and Amy Smith.

Overall my time working with “Team Horse” has been not only beneficial for my future work but also incredibly fun. I would urge anyone who is interested in a research group to apply for a JRA as it can really improve your skills and open up new opportunities. I feel as though I am prepared for my third year project now as I have had a taste of how running an experiment works. Following on from my third year project research I would love to continue in this line of work, and being able to work alongside PhD and Masters students has been very encouraging.

Find out more about our research on Cognitive Psychology.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Can meditation make you less prejudiced?

By Xander Stell

Although meditation and related practices once were considered too ‘esoteric’ to study scientifically, research on these topics has burgeoned within psychology and neuroscience. This is, in part, because meditation has been linked to a raft of positive outcomes such as greater happiness, increased cognitive flexibility, more effective regulation of emotions and lower disease risk.

These benefits however are normally observed at the level of the individual; the meditator themselves. Much less work has explored how practicing meditation can affect how people think of and behave towards others. This lack is particularly notable given that traditional accounts of meditation often emphasise inter-personal harmony as an important practice goal.

One suggestion is that practicing certain types of meditation may help us widen the circle of what we consider to be ‘us’. That is, instead of being identified with our local groups and roles (e.g. white person, black person, teacher, footballer) meditation training may orient us towards feeling part of a more universal community (e.g. all humans). If meditation does have this effect, it may have implications for combatting social ills such prejudice and discrimination.

Picture by Balint Földesi (CC)

Picture by Balint Földesi (CC)

Tom Farsides (my supervisor) and I were interested in the technique known to Buddhists as Loving-Kindness Meditation (LKM), which involves creating a mental image of someone and then wishing that person health and happiness. First this is done for people that this is easy for (e.g. a sick puppy) and then it is done towards people you feel neutral towards and finally towards those ‘difficult’ people in your life (although in Buddhism these are classically called ‘enemies’!). The Dalai Lama has called this process ‘widening the circle of love’. We wanted to see whether getting people to do LKM towards a member of another ethnic group would reduce what is known as implicit racial bias, which is the largely automatic preference people tend to show for their own ethnic group. This test (which you can take yourself online at Project Implicit: projectimplicit.com) is a series of reaction time tests where people are asked to match up positive and negative words with faces that belong to either their own or another ethnic group. On average people are quicker to match positive words with their own group and quicker to match negative words to the other group. This produces a bias ‘score’ that is considered a more robust measure of prejudice than traditional questionnaire data, which are known to be strongly influenced by social desirability.

We got students identifying as ‘white’ to look at a photo of a gender-matched black person. Then they either received taped LKM instructions, or had instructions to look at the photos and notice certain features of the face. Both conditions lasted just seven minutes.

Even with this short induction, those doing LKM showed significantly less implicit bias than those in the control condition. Additionally we measured levels of positive emotions that were either ‘other-regarding’ (e.g. love, gratitude, awe, elevation) and those that were more self directed (e.g. contentment, joy, pride) and found that people doing LKM showed large increases specifically in these other-regarding emotions. Through some statistical untangling, these other-regarding emotions were found to be what drive the reduction of bias.

These results seem to indicate that some meditation techniques are about much more than feeling good, and might be an important tool for enhancing inter-group harmony.

Reference: Stell, A. J., & Farsides, T. (2015). Brief loving-kindness meditation reduces racial bias, mediated by positive other-regarding emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 1-8.

Find out more about our research on Social and Applied Psychology.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

The Undergraduate Student Mentor Scheme

Hi!,

 We’re the new Psychology Undergraduate Student Mentors. We are second and third year undergraduate students who have been trained to provide information and support to other students in the School of Psychology.
We can offer information and support on a range of academic issues, we include an international student and a mature student, so we hope between us to be able to cover anything that comes up for you:

Elle and Alex at a mentoring session in the Bridge Cafe

Elle and Alex at a mentoring session in the Bridge Cafe

  • Come and have a cup of tea with us in the Bridge Cafe – this semester we’re there every Tuesday and Thursday 3-4pm
  • We can discuss active learning strategies with you and help you to develop your study skills (e.g. how to prepare for seminars, types of revision strategies, how to manage your time)
  • We can help you find your way around campus and know where to go for academic support (e.g. finding your way around the library, where to go for IT help, finding quiet study spaces)
  • We can help you to make the most of the academic support in your school (e.g. how to prepare for a meeting with your academic advisor, how to make the most of you tutor’s office hours)
  • We can show you how to proofread your own work but cannot proofread your work for you

There are some areas that we do not cover:

  • Mentors cannot teach you your course material; you should contact your tutors or your academic advisor if you are struggling with your academic work.
  • Mentors cannot give advice or guidance on personal matters, but we can help you with where to go for more support; you can always talk to a Student Life Advisor at the Student Life Centre. You can book an appointment via the Study tab on your Sussex Direct page

You can talk confidentially to a mentor: however if a mentor is concerned about something that you tell them, we will pass on our concerns to their manager, the Director of Student Experience or the Student Life Centre to ensure you get the proper support. If you have a complaint about your mentor or your experience of mentoring you should contact the Director of Student Experience.

You can contact mentors using the Sussex email ugmentors@psychology.sussex.ac.uk, we can offer you support by email, or arrange to meet you on campus.

We look forward to working with you!

Best wishes

Elle, Claire, Kirsty, Maddie, Alice, Giulia, Alex

 

 

 

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Apes Point from a Distance

By David Leavens

Recently, van der Goot, Tomasello, and Liszkowski (2014) reported that human infants, but not great apes, pointed to desirable objects from a distance. The 10 apes in their study all moved as close as possible to desirable food before gesturing to it. They concluded that the babies who pointed from a distance did so because they had an advanced, human-unique understanding of a shared psychological space with the experimenters (“common ground”). We wanted to see whether chimpanzees would sometimes point from a distance, like the babies in van der Goot et al. (2014).

Photo by Gabriel Pollard

Photo by Gabriel Pollard

We exposed 166 chimpanzees to (a) desirable food and (b) a human experimenter, presented outside their enclosures, at an angular displacement. We measured whether or not they gestured, the target of their gesture (the food or the experimenter), counting only gestures that were accompanied by alternation of gaze between the food and the experimenter. We administered four trials to each chimpanzee. Because van der Goot et al. (2014) administered different distances to the humans (.95 to 1.8 meters) and the apes (6.0 meters) in their study, it is ambiguous whether the ape/human differences they reported were attributable to their different evolutionary backgrounds or simply these different distances. Therefore, we matched the distances they used with human babies, presenting desirable food to chimpanzees at 1.0 to 1.5 meters.

We found that, like the human babies in van der Goot et al.’s study, half of the chimpanzees approached the food, and half of them pointed towards the food from a distance–there were no statistical differences between our chimpanzees and the human babies in the study by van der Goot et al.

Thus, chimpanzees do, in fact, frequently indicate referents from a distance. We conclude that either (a) van der Goot and her colleagues are correct to use communication distance as an index of advanced psychological representations of a shared psychological space, and therefore this appreciation of common ground is a primitive psychological capacity that we share with great apes, or (b) communication from a distance does not illuminate the psychological processes supporting gestural communication in either apes or humans. We favor the latter interpretation, but whether distance of signaling does or does not index a psychological appreciation of common ground, our findings clearly demonstrate that chimpanzees do not perform differently from human babies, therefore there is no scientific evidence for a psychological difference between humans and apes in their signaling behavior in these situations. Although we found distal signaling from the very first trials in our sample of chimpanzees, we think that a better approach, when faced with divergent results between humans and apes, especially small groups of apes, is to specify the kinds of experiences apes require to match performance with humans. If no amount of training can produce equivalent performance, then there might be a real species difference; if, on the other hand, the capability can be demonstrated in non-humans, then there is no basis to conclude that the capability is unique to humans.

This post is a summary of the article “Distal Communication by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Evidence for Common Ground?” published in Child Development (2015; published online in advance of print). The research, funded with research grants from the National Institutes of Health and a Grant Development Award from the School of Psychology, was carried out by Dr David Leavens and collaborators from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Georgia State University.

Find out more about our research on Developmental Psychology.

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Experience with the JRA scheme

By Ruihan Wu

In the spring term of the second year of my undergraduate degree, I applied to the Junior Research Associate (JRA) scheme, with Nicola Yuill of the Children and Technology Lab (insert link) as my supervisor. This scheme, funded by the doctoral school in the University with support from alumni donations, provides second years with the opportunity to get a taste of life as a researcher, by working on research projects developed in tandem with leading academics.

The activities of doing background research, forming hypotheses, analysing data, interpreting results, etc. had really fascinated me during the two modules of research skills I had already done. I was very eager for an opportunity to work in a research atmosphere and build on my academic portfolio. And also, to have it funded was the icing on the cake. These were the reasons I applied for the JRA scheme when I read about it at the end of my first year. Although the application is rather competitive my interest in psychology research drove me to give it a try.

I knew Nicola and her ChatLab from a first year lecture. After looking at her lab website, I was really interested in autistic spectrum conditions (ASCs) and decided to do my project in this area. Before applying, I emailed and went to see her with my initial project idea. Fortunately, she was interested in my idea and helped me adjust the research proposal and submit it for ethical review.

Prior research of alphabetic writing systems has demonstrated that information up to 14 or 15 characters to the right and 3 or 4 characters to the left of fixation is used during reading (Fig. 1). This region of effective vision is refer to as the perceptual span from which readers obtain useful information.

Figure 1. An example of perceptual span and fixation of skilled readers

Figure 1. An example of perceptual span and fixation of skilled readers

My JRA project investigated whether perceptual span, measured by eye movements, could explain some of the difficulties in reading comprehension reported by children with ASC. This meant getting children to read in front of an eye-tracker that takes a film of eye movements superimposed onto text on the screen. This was fascinating to watch, both for me and for the participants in the study. I was able to apply my previous research experience in eye tracking to this project but also discovered how research is so often a team effort: we could not have done the work without the eye tracking expertise.

Figure 2. The place where the experiment be conducted

Figure 2. The place where the experiment be conducted

Previous research shows that skilled readers usually have a larger perceptual span than less skilled readers. Children with ASC experience unique challenges with reading comprehension, but some of them have some superior perceptual skills. Thus, we thought that typically-developing children might show larger perceptual spans than children with ASC.

Understanding more about how eyes scan the page during reading will help us understand more about the role of eye movements in reading comprehension and may also help designing interventions to improve reading.

Thanks to this JRA opportunity, I learned a lot about a new topic working with Nicola and her team. Moreover, the JRA help me to improve my research skills outside term time and beyond the taught modules. I have now run my own research study, learned new methodological and analytic techniques, and spent time with ASC children and their parents, which was new. It has been a challenging but rewarding learning curve. I really have enjoyed my JRA project and would like to pursue my postgraduate study in this field.

I would like to thank Nicola for her unwavering guidance. She taught me how to work and research independently. This ability is essential for one who wants to work in academia, for it helps to develop research capabilities, step by step, from conceiving a research proposal to carrying it out and then to presenting it. I am also grateful to Dr Sam Hutton for sharing his eye-tracking expertise, constructing the software program to run the study, and contributing so much to the analysis and interpretation of data, and to Dr Graham Hole for providing lab facilities. I am also grateful for the support of Chris Girvan, a postgraduate student who acted as my mentor. He had completed a JRA himself, so understood the process well, and is now doing a PhD with Nicola as a direct result of his JRA research. I also had the chance to attend and present my work at ChaTLab meetings, benefitting from the advice and experience of a range of researchers in the field. I really do recommend this opportunity to everyone who is interested in research.

Ruihan Wu is currently studying her final year.

Find out more about our research on Cognitive Psychology.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Unexpected

By Hause Lin

 

Many assigned readings for most modules seemed uninteresting at best. Two papers in particular—White’s (1967) “The historical roots of our ecologic crisis” and Hardin’s (1968) “The tragedy of the commons”—come instantly to mind. These titles just sound dull and mind-numbing, especially to a first-year undergraduate. Till today, I still have little idea why I decided to read these two papers then; I might have si­mply been dutiful, or perhaps I just hadn’t had anything else more exciting to do. But today, I’m glad I bothered to read these two classics a few years ago because they have helped me get to where I am today.

It’s hard to believe I spent half a decade at Sussex. I find it even harder to believe that reading papers with dull-looking titles was why I had decided to remain at—and eventually leave—Sussex. I read them, liked the arguments, and spoke to the lecturer, Dr. Paul Sparks, who assigned them. And that was how I found, by and for myself, my very first adviser.

During one of our first meetings, Paul remarked that social psychology has generally been more concerned with the ‘whys’, whereas neuroscience the ‘hows’, and that the two questions might be incompatible in many situations. It sounded right then. But that I’m now doing social neuroscience research as a graduate student suggests I probably no longer agree with that rather arbitrary why-how distinction. Still, because of his generous sharing of his philosophies, I’ve learnt a great deal about (the problems with) science in general. It was also through him that I met and found my third-year project supervisor, Dr. Eleanor Miles. Both of them, along with the other advisers I met later on, gradually and indirectly convinced me that I should probably do my PhD in North America.

Undergraduate Awards at Farmleigh House and Estate. 20 November 2014

Undergraduate Awards at Farmleigh House and Estate.
20 November 2014

Another thing I’m really glad about is that I took the module “Drugs, Brain, and Behaviour” in my final year, despite not being particularly fond of addiction research. Both of the module lecturers, Drs. Hans Crombag and Eisuke Koya, turned out to be—beyond description. Having spent a significant chunk of their careers in the States, they strongly recommended I do the same, and offered tips on what graduate admissions committees look for in applicants. So, this module was, retrospectively and (un)expectedly, my favourite at Sussex. Moreover, the assigned readings weren’t boring at all; in fact, they were very challenging but tremendously rewarding to read once I’ve dissected them. From this module, I’ve learnt to appreciate the rigour and elegance of neuroscience experiments, which are qualities I would love to see more of in social psychological research.

I particularly enjoyed my final years at Sussex, mainly because I had considerable latitude in deciding what to study and what type of research to do. My advisers, including my academic adviser, Dr. Chris Bird, have been and still are very supportive: I cannot emphasise enough how hard they’ve tried to make sure I get to do my PhD with my favourite potential graduate school adviser.

I’m now in Toronto, studying social neuroscience and decision making with another brilliant adviser, Dr. Michael Inzlicht. We’re adapting the psychometric-neurometric approach so that we can try to model and quantify neural activity when people make decisions. It’s quite an undertaking, especially since it’s my very first project in this laboratory. “Initially, you’re going to struggle because nothing will make sense, but a year later, you’ll be the expert,” said my new adviser during one of our first meetings. Indeed, everything has stretched me quite a bit so far, and I hope things will become slightly more penetrable in the foreseeable future.

Great things sometimes do happen when least expected. Things would have been very different today had I dismissed two papers solely on the basis of their titles several years ago—I might not have remained at Sussex as long as I did, I might not have moved across the Atlantic Ocean, and who knows? One thing for sure, though, is that I’ve always enjoyed the extraordinary privilege of learning from people who are unstinting in their advice. And I’ll definitely meet many more amazing people and work on bigger, more challenging projects in my next half decade in Toronto.

 

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Transferable Skills

Confession 1: I hate writing letters of recommendation. Of course, I still do it and I try to do it well. But I find writing letters of recommend to be relatively stressful. Each year, thousands of students graduate with an undergraduate degree in Psychology across the UK. Relatively few of these graduates continue in research (i.e. MSc and PhD programmes). The majority of graduates get other kinds of jobs, working for the NHS, schools and businesses. It is writing letters for these students that I find stressful. How can I write a good letter of recommendation that helps my Sussex students stand out from all of those other well-qualified applicants?

One approach I take is to try and communicate to the letter-reader how the skills my students have gained doing their final year research project relates to the job for which they have applied. Oh, you need someone who can be in charge of confidential information? Well, Emma will be able to do that because she has experience maintaining a database of confidential documents (consent forms, hardcopy data). The post holder should “be trustworthy because the role involves making payments”? In my lab, Matthew was entrusted to handle money and keep track of expenses (participant reimbursements). And the job requires excellent communication skills? Rosie has outstanding communication skills. As part of her research she routinely explained the goals and findings of our research to members of the public, both through recruitment emails and in person.

Jessica Horst and Lauren Lush (BSc Psychology, 2010) on graduation day

Jessica Horst and Lauren Lush (BSc Psychology, 2010) on graduation day

Skills like these are transferable skills: skills that you can learn in one domain and use in another. It turns out that psychological research is filled with transferable skills. It really is a great foundation for so many things. To do research well, not only do you need to have good “practical” skills (e.g. time management, organisation, attention to detail) you need to write strong, convincing arguments like philosophy students; write about complicated information such that someone from another discipline can understand like journalism students; be able to read and understand dense, technical scientific writing like neuroscience students and have a good understanding of mathematical principles like statistics students. These are highly marketable skills—and all programmes equip students to learn them the way psychology does.

Confession 2: I love doing research. I love pretty much the entire process from formulating the first question to creating a spreadsheet to presenting my findings with a snazzy powerpoint in front of a large audience. I especially love conducting research with young children because I have to be creative. I can’t just ask a 2-year-old “how do you know what this word means?” and expect an informative verbal answer. Instead, I need to create tasks that are easy—but not too easy!—for young children to complete that still answer the research question without asking them directly while maintaining validity and reliability.

Fortunately, I understand that even though doing a final year project where you can read storybooks to preschoolers or interact with unusual objects is fun, not everyone wants to continue in research after graduation.

So now, one of my goals is to not only tell employer letter-readers what transferable skills my students have learned, but also to tell my students what transferable skills they have learned and to help them decide which tasks they enjoy and are good at, so they can make informed decisions about which jobs to apply for. Although many of my students will not continue in research, I hope they will enjoy whatever career path they do choose as much as I enjoy mine.

If you are a current student or recent graduate, the Careers and Employability Centre would be happy to help you further with whatever stage of the process you are in: from planning to get the most out of your studies, to writing a CV, to finding employment opportunities. Drop-in appointments and one-on-one sessions are also available. The next Careers Fair will also take place on 4 November 11:00-3:00 at the Amex Stadium. Over 100 potential employers will be there.

 

Dr Jessica Horst is the Careers and Employability Liaison for the School of Psychology. She is a developmental psychologist and director of the WORD LabJessica has recently published a book on transferable research skills https://www.routledge.com/products/9781138785328

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.