The scrapping of the zero carbon homes undermines trust in government’s commitment to energy efficiency

The government’s decision to scrap the zero carbon homes target plus the equivalent for non-domestic houses is a major setback for achieving a low carbon UK and will undermine the credibility of the policy mix on building energy efficiency and beyond. The zero carbon homes target was announced in 2006 and, as the name suggests, was an obligation for any new home to be built from 2016 to be ‘zero carbon’. This includes improvements to be building fabric compared to standard new buildings and measures such as on-site renewable energy generation. Since this is difficult to achieve, the government then introduced so-called ‘allowable solutions’ which are measures which can be implemented off-site to reduce emissions to complement the on-site carbon savings. The recent announcement on the details of the allowable solutions has already been criticised as being ‘watered down’ compared to the original target.

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED, Housing, News

How Scotland could make the most of its energy efficiency policies (and why the rebound effect could be a good thing)

CIED project partners at the Centre for Energy Policy (CEP) at University of Strathclyde together with Climate XChange recently held an event ‘How Scotland could make the most of its energy efficiency policies.’ Hosted by the Scottish Government, the event presented insights from recent CEP research, including work on household energy efficiency and rebound effects. Following an introduction by Scottish Government’s Chris Stark, the programme commenced with a discussion, led by Lisa Ryan of University College Dublin, on the multiple benefits of energy efficiency – including positive impacts on economic growth and human welfare. This was followed two senior researchers at Strathclyde – Karen Turner, Director of the Centre for Energy Policy who presented on industrial energy efficiency and productivity-led growth and Simon Gill on the energy supply industry.

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED, Guest Blog

“Politicians still hesitate while the world warms” – Reflections on OECD Angel Gurría’s speech

Angel Gurría, secretary-general of the OECD, gave a tour-de-force speech in London on 3rd of June 2015 as part of the organisation’s build-up to COP21 in Paris. He drew upon “Aligning Policies for a Low-carbon Economy“, an OECD report that was produced with the International Energy Agency, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Transport Forum, but his speech was not a dry litany of managerial tweaks that civil servants might make to public policy.

Gurría challenged assumptions about the impact of a low-carbon energy system on economic growth, business competitiveness, and also development goals. “There’s a flawed but deeply rooted idea that development comes before decarbonisation. That there is a certain inevitable sequence. While developing economies will inevitably increase their emissions, there is no iron law in the 21st century that it has to be as fossil intensive as it has been in the past. Viable alternatives are already commercially available.” He bemoaned the lack of a price on carbon and the scale of investment into unabated coal-fired electricity generation. Then the former minister of finance laid into the discount rate – used to compare costs and benefits that occur in different time periods – which leads to “ …our grandchildren end up having no value – simple as that! Brutal as that!” This was a speech that could have been made at a climate change demo. Instead, I was at sitting in the City of London, in the company of investors and representatives of some of the biggest companies in the world. While some may have disagreed with his analysis, the applause extended well beyond politeness. But it is not unusual nowadays for establishment figures to call in strident terms for action on climate change. Lord Nicholas Stern, who introduced Gurría, was among the first, and the latest being Pope Francis.

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, policy

A peek into Bristol’s vibrant community energy scene

Last week I visited Bristol to attend the event ‘Our energy future: the road not (yet) taken’. This was part of the city’s annual Big Green Week, an ‘international festival of better living and great ideas’, which incidentally, is now two weeks long. The people I met convinced me that the city has much to offer when it comes to innovative approaches to the challenges faced by those searching for fairer and more sustainable energy futures. Energy poverty, community engagement, and sustainability were high on the agenda.

The event aimed to air different stakeholder positions on Bristol’s potential energy future and began with short intros from six panelists before an hour of audience-led Q&A debate. Hosted and chaired by Jake Barnes of Bristol Energy Network (my colleague at SPRU), the event featured a diverse and interesting panel, with representatives from the Bristol City Council, community energy groups, the Centre for Sustainable Energy and Good Energy and Ovo Energy. The composition of the panel demonstrates the diversity of actors that have a stake in the future energy sector.

Pinning down a debate like this is always a challenging task, so I wanted to share some of my insights from this discussion in this post. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, Community Energy, Housing

The end of onshore wind subsidies: what now for ‘secure, affordable and low-carbon’ electricity?

On Thursday, the government announced that it would be ending subsidies for onshore wind under the Renewables Obligation a year earlier than planned, in April 2016. There are also plans to give local communities a veto over new wind farms, in line with Conservative manifesto commitments. By removing support for one of the UK’s most cost-effective low-carbon generating technologies, this decision could make it far more difficult to achieve DECC’s stated aim of a ‘secure, affordable and low-carbon energy system’, and illustrates DECC’s complete lack of decision-making power. The announcement was met with consternation from some quarters, and confusion from others. The Scottish government said that the plans are “irrational” and “deeply regrettable”, whilst industry body Scottish Renewables said the move would put many of the 5,400 jobs in Scotland’s onshore wind sector at risk, according to the Financial Times.

Carbon Brief, meanwhile, notes that there is considerable uncertainty around the interaction between the new Contracts for Difference (which were designed to replace the Renewables Obligation) and the Conservative manifesto commitment to end subsidies for onshore wind. Amber Rudd stated that “with regard to CfDs, we have the tools available to implement our manifesto commitments on onshore wind and I will set out how I will do so when announcing plans in relation to further CfD allocations”. Such vague statements can surely do little to appease the rampant uncertainty which is currently flying around amongst investors.

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, policy, Wind energy

Follow Sussex Energy Group on Twitter

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent Sussex Energy Group.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 113 other subscribers.

Archives

Subscribe to Sussex Energy Group's quarterly newsletter