The Eco Technology Show 2014

Low carbon innovation, energy services, renewable heat, new economy, sustainable transport – these were only some of the topics covered by the two-day Eco Technology Show 2014, which took place in the Brighton Centre on 26-27 June, 2014.

This government is delivering like no other” on climate change and “we need to make green mainstream”, were some of the remarks made by Greg Barker MP, Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change, in his keynote speech which opened the seminar series of the event.

Greg Barker MP, Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change (image Mari Martiskainen)

Greg Barker MP, Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change (image Mari Martiskainen)

From a Government’s viewpoint, as the Minister put it, it is important to focus on a few really important things and deliver on those. He mentioned some general pointers and statistics, such as the introduction of the Climate Change act; that the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions were 25% below 1990 levels; that over 500,000 people were using the Feed in Tariff (FIT); that during the weekend before, 8% of the UK’s electricity generation had come from solar; and that £3.9 billion had been invested in the Green Investment Bank. This all sounds very impressive coming from a Minister, who is adept at public speaking. However, when you look at some of the figures more closely, you start to wonder how the UK could do better. Charles Perry, Director of Anthesis – SecondNature, who chaired the talk, pointed out that in Germany, it is not unheard of that 50% of electricity comes from solar in the summer months, while Bangladesh is installing one solar panel each minute. Furthermore, the UK’s recently published Solar Strategy was watered down from an initial target of 20 gigawatts (GW) by 2020 to 12GW by 2020. And there is no mention of the estimated £110 billion cost of the UK’s nuclear waste clean up compared to the level of financial support for renewables. What was perhaps more telling was the Minister’s visibly deep sigh when a member of the audience raised the inevitable question on fracking. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in All Posts

Makers, fixers and circular economies

The connection between grassroots making and fixing movements and innovation for low energy demand may not be immediately obvious. When thinking about energy demand and resource use it is reasonable to focus attention on immediate and intensive activities, such as heating homes or offices, or making energy-using products more efficient. However, if we think about the energy used to make and distribute the products used in those built environments perhaps links with making and fixing become less tenuous? Products ‘embody’ energy demand in terms of the resources required to mine, process, manufacture, and distribute them. As products break and become discarded, so further energy is demanded in the production of replacements.

Even relatively low energy using products like laptop computers attract criticism about the energy (and water) demands in their manufacture. The manufacture of microchips is energy intensive and has a material intensity in order of magnitude higher than ‘traditional’ products. With more products going digital, through the incorporation of smarter control systems, for example – and speculation about them communicating with one another and us via an ‘Internet of Things’ – then perhaps we need to think about embodied energy? Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED

Energy efficiency – a people’s revolution?

If I told you that you could make an investment that yielded long term, guaranteed monthly returns – greater than a savings account and more secure than stocks and shares – with no upfront costs, as well as adding additional value to your home, you’d bite my hand off right?

cied launch

Energy efficiency improvements under the UK’s Green Deal policy offer this type of potential, with the scheme tipped as the trigger to ‘a third industrial revolution’. However by the end of 2013 only 12 homes had installed Green Deal improvements, with no such revolution materialising.

So if the Green Deal isn’t the answer, what is needed for the UK to achieve an energy efficiency revolution? This was the topic of the Centre for Innovation and Energy Demand’s (CIED) launch event, which untied in discussion a panel of 5 heavy hitting speakers alongside a room of 90 professionals from across the industry in the impressive surroundings of Portcullis House, Parliament.

Introductory comments from Dr Alan Whitehead, MP for Southampton, highlighted the increasingly urgent need for energy efficiency to assist in making a meaningful dent in the UK’s climate change commitments. This would require significant step changes in efficiency gains by 2030- is the sector up to meeting this challenge? Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with:
Posted in All Posts

Can the UK achieve an energy efficiency revolution?

The Centre on Innovation and Energy Demand (CIED) was officially launched at a well-attended joint event with the All Party Parliamentary Climate Change Group at Portcullis House, London on 12th June 2014. Dr Alan Whitehead MP chaired a vigorous debate on the future energy-efficiency revolution – introduced by five panellists and followed by broader and very informed contributions from the floor.

Steve Sorrell, Director of CIED and Co-Director of the Sussex Energy Group, SPRU, began by providing an overview of the Centre and its approach to reducing energy demand. Steve argued that the dominant approaches to energy efficiency policy, informed by orthodox economics and social psychology, needed to be supplemented by much greater emphasis on technological innovation and long-term transformation of the ‘socio-technical’ systems used to deliver heating, mobility and other services. Moreover,sustaining long-termreductions in energy demand requires the multiple rebound effects triggered by such changes to be effectively addressed. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED

EU renewable energy policy: looking beyond leaders, laggards and political will

With a lot of interim targets for the EU 2020 agenda already behind us the time has come to evaluate what Member States have achieved so far and what still needs to be done to meet the renewable energy targets in six years’ time. Equally, it is an opportune time to (re)consider the processes involved in developing domestic renewable policy informed by EU targets and agenda.

In the beginning of May I took part in a workshop titled The EU Renewable Energy Policy: Challenges and Opportunities organised by a team from the Environmental Policy Research Center (FFU) of Freie University in Berlin. The workshop reviewed the development of wind, solar, hydro power and biomass energy in several Member States and discussed the extent to which the processes of Europeanisation have changed the make up of domestic energy sectors. The discussion included over 24 researchers from a wide range of institutions, who reviewed a mixed bag of countries including France, Italy, Spain, UK, Germany, Denmark, Austria, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria. This overview of renewable energy policy across the EU reinforced for me the range of issues and nuances that are obscured by using blanket terms like political will, leaders and laggards. Several trends that emerged from the discussion suggest that it is high time for a shift in how we think about renewable energy policy in Member States.

While initially the EU renewable directives did bring about significant changes of energy policy in most countries, it translated into changes in their energy mix that were significantly less impressive. The history of renewable energy in Europe since the 1990s shows that no such thing as direct transposition of EU directives could possibly exist. EU directives cannot be simply “downloaded” onto very different national contexts. Instead what emerges is a process of negotiation between the domestic context and the EU targets and policy. This makes thinking about the implementation of EU renewable policy in terms of leaders and laggards rather unhelpful and obsolete. Are leaders countries which have developed the capacity to quickly and fully implement EU renewable directives? Or countries which have succeeded in meeting their (interim) renewable targets? Because on one hand, the variety of renewable histories discussed showed that renewable targets can be achieved without the full implementation of EU directives. On the other hand, the full implementation of EU renewable directives was not a guarantee of coming close to achieving relevant targets. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in All Posts

Follow Sussex Energy Group on Twitter

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent Sussex Energy Group.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 102 other subscribers.

Archives

Subscribe to Sussex Energy Group's quarterly newsletter