Opportunity and crisis in South Africa’s electricity

In April I wrote a blog in Le Monde Diplomatique about South Africa’s on-going electricity crisis. This crisis has resulted in regular load-shedding across the country since late last year as the country’s cash strapped utility Eskom faces a $17 billion funding gap to 2018. Electricity consumers face a 250 per cent cumulative increase in electricity prices since 2008. The country’s state-owned monopoly electricity sector was almost exclusively coal-fired until a procurement programme for privately generated renewable energy was introduced in 2011. Since writing my blog, there have been a number of notable developments in an electricity sector that is currently subject to constant confusion and very likely, change. Despite the uncertainty it is clear that South Africa’s electricity crisis has opened a window of opportunity for the development of different technologies and the procurement models that facilitate them.

Firstly in mid-April, government announced the winners of the latest round of the country’s renewable energy independent power producers’ procurement programme (RE IPPPP). This takes the total of privately generated renewable energy up to 5.2 GW (the country’s total installed capacity is currently 44 GW, of which only 33 GW is currently available). Government has also announced that a further 6 GW of renewables will be procured by 2020. In the case of electricity generated by wind and solar PV IPPs, the average cost of electricity has now reached grid parity with Eskom’s coal-fired power plants still under construction. When built, Medupi and Kusile will be the largest coal-fired power plants on the continent at 4,800 MW each. However, both have been subject to delays, labour unrest, and continuing cost overruns.

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, Fossil fuels

Innovation supporting intermediaries needed in advancing low energy building and housing

Photograph of paula kivimaa

The emergence of new innovations and their diffusion is extremely important in the field of low energy building and housing. As buildings throughout their lifecycle account for around 40% of total energy use in Europe (with over half by residential buildings), reducing the energy demand of the existing building stock and increasing non-carbon micro-generation in connection to buildings is crucial.

Due to the poor energy performance of our buildings, the sector is also amongst the most significant greenhouse gas emissions sources in Europe. Renewable energy, including solar power and ground source heat pumps, have gained increasing interest from house owners in Europe. Recently, we have witnessed increasing rates of diffusion for these technologies. Simultaneously, however, the need to improve the energy efficiency of the existing housing stock has received too little attention in many European countries, including the UK.

Why do we need this kind of low energy innovation now and not later? Because the building stock renews very slowly and investments into buildings made today will continue to impact for a long time after. This means that less efficient investments will be using more energy for a long time. It has also been acknowledged that the rate and extent of renovation needs to be increased across Europe to meet the EU climate and energy targets for 2050. In practice, this means that all of today’s buildings will need to be renovated by 2050, doubling the current building renovation rate. While EU legislation is in place to address some of the challenges, one of the problems is that renovation is still less addressed than new build. Regulations regarding the former are more problematic as unreasonable claims cannot be made to home owners. Therefore, we need to rely more on ‘carrot’, ‘sermon’ and voluntary action by a range of actors than regulation. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED

Don’t fix women or numbers, fix the system!

Catherine Mitchell famously argued in 2014 that the energy sector is very illustrative of the inequalities that characterize UK research institutions – minimal women presence in a space dominated by older and white males – with worrying effects on diversity of thinking and innovative thinking and practices during a period of important transformation, both within society and the energy sector. She called time for evening things up a bit by changing the governance process in place, and the provision of incentives that encourage new ways of doing things.

Gender equality in the workplace is about fixing the system, not fixing the women. SPRU recently hosted a workshop to look at best practices for achieving gender equality in research. The overwhelming message from the discussion was that gender training should become part and parcel of institutional culture.

The temptation to focus gender equality efforts on providing women with the “right types of skills” and increasing women’s numbers in the workplace is big, especially when the gender gap is wide. However, the approach imposes an undue burden on the individual woman’s responsibilities. Instead, responsibilities should be shared with the institution and society at large. Such were some of the ideas put forward at an interactive workshop on International Approaches to Support Gender Equality in Research Careers for postdoctoral research staff, early career academic faculty and final year PhDs, recently hosted at the University of Sussex. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts

The Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency

Lee Stapleton at the Eiffel Tower

On Monday 20th April, the International Energy Agency convened a workshop at its headquarters in Paris to discuss the state-of-the-art in evaluating the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. This workshop was attended by around 50 people – evaluators, policy makers and academics – from over a dozen countries. The Sussex Energy Group was represented by Lee Stapleton.

Energy use avoided in 2010 by IEA countries (due to investments since 1974) exceeded the demand met by any single primary energy source e.g. oil and gas (IEA, 2014). Yet there is untapped efficiency potential because of barriers such as information failures. Beyond reduced energy demand and lower greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency delivers benefits in other areas such as energy security, employment and health and wellbeing. Importantly, these benefits are often overlooked despite their potential for increasing the justification for and adoption of energy efficiency interventions. Thinking in terms of multiple benefits also changes the way we think about the so-called rebound effect. Energy efficiency improvements reduce the effective price of energy services such as heating and cooling. This can result in a rebound, or take-back, whereby more energy services are consumed because they are cheaper. This has tended to be viewed negatively e.g. undermining efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Taking a multiple benefits approach means, for example, acknowledging the potential positives of rebound e.g. reducing fuel poverty and increasing energy security. However there is much work still to be done to get a handle on the nature and extent of rebound in different contexts. Indeed, this is one of the focal points of research currently being undertaken in the Centre on Innovation and Energy Demand. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED

Experiments in Climate Governance – Reflections on a workshop

Photo of Bipashyee Ghosh

In early March 2015, the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) hosted the ‘Innovations in Climate Governance’ (INOGOV) workshop. The INOGOV is a Tyndall Centre for Climate change research initiative, which started in 2014, and is a 4 year funded programme by the European Co-operation in Science and Technology (COST). The initiative brought together 24 countries in building a strong network for exploring and sharing knowledge about ‘source, diffusion and effects of policy and governance innovations’ for adapting and mitigating climate change. This particular workshop was themed around “experiments”.

Andy Jordan, the chair of INOGOV and Professor of Environmental Policy in the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, gave an introductory speech to kick start the workshop. He spoke about the importance of state level policies and role of civil societies in transnational climate governance. Embracing this polycentric approach to climate governance, which provides scope for experimentation and mutual learning, greater attention is required to identify leadership, support scaling up and to facilitate better coordination among the transnational actors. Mikael Hilden, professor at SYKE and the director of a working group studying effect, effectiveness and legitimacy of the policy experimentation – acted as the wonderful host, organiser and facilitator for the workshop. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in All Posts, policy

Follow Sussex Energy Group on Twitter

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent Sussex Energy Group.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 102 other subscribers.

Archives

Subscribe to Sussex Energy Group's quarterly newsletter