Back to the DTI? – The merger of DECC and BIS is a new opportunity to integrate energy and industrial policies

Department of Energy & Climate Change, Westminster (image by Nigel Cox and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence)

Department of Energy & Climate Change, Westminster (image by Nigel Cox and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence)

As part of the new Prime Minister’s extensive reshuffle late last week, it was announced that the Departments of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) are to merge to form a new Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). Taken at face value, this looks like a backwards step to a time when energy and climate policy were much less important. But is the creation of BEIS necessarily a bad thing? Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in All Posts, News, policy

South Africa: could gas pave the way towards greener sources of energy?

In South Africa, the process of mining coal for power generation or for export is increasingly becoming difficult, because the ability to source finances in a carbon conscious market is limited. The country wants to reduce its dependence on coal and believes that in order to meet uncertain electricity demand, a smaller, more modular, and flexible form of electricity generation is needed. Liquefied natural gas (LNG), which burns more cleanly than any other fossil fuel, is deemed critical for paving the way towards an energy transition from dirtier coal to a greener source of energy. Gas complements not only renewable energy penetration, but it also speaks to regional trade ambitions within the Southern African Development Community (SADC), energy diversification, as well as integration into re-industrialization policies.

Coal miner with a helmet and headlamp

Coal miner returning home after his shift underground. Sourcing financing for coal mining is becoming more difficult in an increasingly carbon conscious market. Credit: Jan Truter (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The technology to transport LNG via ships is also becoming more sophisticated, which would allow it to bypass the conventional route of pipelines. Therefore, a co-evolution of technology maturity, market dynamics, user preferences, energy and industrial policy are aligning to enable gas use in the country.

With this as its backdrop, South Africa launched its Gas Industrialization Unit (GIU) on 16 May 2016 in Cape Town. There are no indications as yet as to where the LNG may be imported or which ports are likely to be the first to gain such an initiative. This is now the second gas initiative by the government. Earlier last year the Department of Energy directed the department to procure a 3.12 GW gas-fired power plant to contribute towards the energy security of the country through the Independent Power Producer Programme (IPP).

It is envisaged that the Gas IPP will serve as a catalyst for industrial development, as it has been indicated that gas could also be a feedstock for new industrial uses, a source of heat for industrial process and for conversion of Gas to Liquid fuels (GTL). Although South Africa does have potential domestic shale gas reserves located within the Karoo region, this development will take many years to realise. Thus, the immediate plans for the Gas IPP is to import Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) through its three ports: Saldanha Bay (West Coast near Cape Town), Coega (Port Elizabeth) and Richards Bay (Durban).

Both initiatives are running in parallel with significant coordination between actors that include government, industries, academia and state-owned entities.

The Gas IPP is thought at this preliminary stage to be coordinated in a bundled offshore project. This means the entire value chain from LNG sourcing, Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU), pipeline to shore, and gas to power plant is to be procured by an independent private entity. Naturally, this would mean that as the Gas IPP is rolled out, bidding would be in the form of a consortium that would require substantial coordination between upstream, midstream and downstream players. Implementation of this programme will prove a challenging task. The challenges include not only coordination between players, but also the dollar base indexation of import LNG prices, which will have a direct impact on domestic electricity tariffs in South Africa. The country is already facing huge public resistance to electricity increases and its domestic currency is weakening against the US dollar. There are also potential implications for existing regulations, such as the Gas Act, the Ports Act, and the Electricity Regulation Act (ERA), which have not yet been applied or tested with this new initiative.

Despite these challenges, there is a substantial push to use gas in the country. South Africa’s policy community keeps emphasising the importance of regional trade between SADC. The main drivers include significant offshore natural gas finds in northern Mozambique, particularly in the Rovuma Basin and Namibian Kudu gas fields. Botswana also has coal bed methane gas, a form of natural gas extracted from coal beds.

Interestingly, these developments are occurring during challenging major shifts in the global LNG market. Traditional buyers, such as Japan, are reducing their LNG imports due to their plans to restart their nuclear reactors. Moreover, countries such as Australia and the USA are starting to increase their capacity to export LNG through various infrastructure developments. Thus, the current perception is that a global supply glut of LNG is expected, with reorientation of traditional buyers and sellers. Furthermore, LNG is also increasingly being perceived as the new “oil” commodity, not only because oil is undergoing uncertainty, but also LNG is becoming easier to ship through advances in liquefaction technologies.

All this will make the South African gas policy and market developments interesting ones to follow.

Blanche Ting is currently a doctoral researcher based at the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) and a member of the Sussex Energy Group at the University of Sussex. Her research is focused on South Africa’s electricity system, with case studies on Independent Power Producers (IPPs), namely gas, renewable and coal and the implications on the dominant state owned monopoly of Eskom. She holds two Masters degrees in Climate Change and Development from the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), UK as a Mandela-Sussex Scholar (2011) and a Masters in Bioprocess Engineering from the University of Cape Town (2004). Her interests are energy transitions in resource base economies, particularly in Africa and Latin America.

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Fossil fuels

Makerspaces: Creating inclusive spaces for sustainable innovations

Making stuff is all the rage these days. But how does sustainable development fit into this enthusiasm?

The White House is celebrating a Week of Making from June 16-23 2016 after hosting its first Maker Faire in 2014 to spark a “grassroots renaissance in American making and manufacturing”. The hope is that by exposing people to design and fabrication skills it will “unleash a new era of jobs and entrepreneurialism in manufacturing and transform industries”. This follows the first ever EU Institutional Maker Faire, European Maker week, which ran from 30 May 2016 to 5 June to celebrate “makers and innovators from all over Europe”. The 400 events across the continent ranged from workshops on 3D printing in Italy to learning how to use a machine to do controlled cutting of hard materials, like composite or wood, in Limerick, Ireland. In February this year, there were also government-supported events to celebrate making in India. The maker movement is both mainstreaming and globalising.

Sign with workshop written on it.

Credit: Nathan Oxley, STEPS Centre.

Read the rest of the blog.

 

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in CIED, Community Energy, renewables

Rethinking energy’s impact on society in Bangladesh and beyond

On the 4th of April 2016, Bangladeshi police opened fire on protesters, killing four people, including a 37-year-old salt cultivator, from the remote village of Gandamara in the district of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Around another 100 villagers were also injured by the approximately 700 rounds fired by the police. They had joined 500 other villagers demonstrating against the planned construction of a large (1320 MW) Chinese financed coal-fired power plant to be built at Banshkhali on coastal farming land.

People speaking at protests a month later in May said that the police were still threatening and harassing Banshkhali people with arrests and detention, with people were now unable to leave their village out of fear. The loss of life doesn’t yet seem to have affected the Government’s efforts to continue supporting the construction of the plant.

These protests are not a new phenomenon in Bangladesh. Three people were shot dead by paramilitary forces when 5000 people congregated to protest against an open-pit coal mine in the district of Phulbari in the north of Bangladesh in 2006, a decade before the 2016 demonstration. Now a globally renowned people’s movement, the incident resulted in a ban on mining in Phulbari, but the struggle has not ended. GCM Resources (formerly Asia Energy Corporation), a London-based company, which is invested in the mining operations, has continued to pile up pressure on the Bangladesh Government, which is now reviewing the plans. A GCM Resources statement says it’s awaiting government approval to begin mining in Phulbari.

Protestors standing with a banner saying no open-pit mining in Bangladesh.

Protestors outside the AGM of GCM Resources in 2012. The company is awaiting Bangladeshi government approval to develop an open-pit coal mine in the district of Phulbari, Bangladesh. Credit: Global Justice Now (CC BY 2.0).

Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Fossil fuels

Customer power: are you the kind of energy user who makes a difference?

In the story of how energy is made and used to keep a country functioning, you don’t get a starring role. You are the passive receiver and consumer of electricity or gas in a tale dominated by governments, corporations and the media. We put the kettle on, we set the thermostat but we don’t take any heat for shaping or challenging the status quo.

In truth though there are distinct, if overlapping, types of energy users which together tell a different story. Most likely without realising, they play a crucial role in creating, altering and establishing new energy systems.

Knowing which consumers are which gives policymakers an opportunity and a reason to get out of the rut of only providing information or raising awareness. Knowing which type you are will give you an understanding of your potential to encourage innovation and aid transition to a new sustainable energy system.

Policies should assist consumers to become active users who experiment and produce new forms of energy; who develop new visions; who campaign for sustainable provision; and who make the links between production, consumption and regulation.

It might sound ambitious, but there are three clear stages to creating sustainable energy production systems. Read more ›

Follow Sussex Energy Group Facebooktwitterlinkedin
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in All Posts, CIED, renewables, the conversation

Follow Sussex Energy Group on Twitter

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent Sussex Energy Group.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 113 other subscribers.

Archives

Subscribe to Sussex Energy Group's quarterly newsletter