Spotlight on AI in Education: June 2026

Welcome to June 2026’s Spotlight on AI in Education bulletin. With how fast things are moving, this will help you cut through the noise and catch what’s important. The bulletin highlights on-the-ground practice, institutional perspectives and trends in generative AI use across the sector and beyond. We hope you find this useful.

If you have anything you’d like to contribute or see in this bulletin please email EE@sussex.ac.uk

On-the-ground at Sussex: The Sixth Meeting of the Teaching with AI Community of Practice

Illustrations produced at the sixth meeting of the AI CoP, depicting our perceptions of AI at Sussex now and in the future.
Illustrations produced at the sixth meeting of the AI CoP, depicting our perceptions of AI at Sussex now and in the future. Read more about these below.

On Monday 8th June Educational Enhancement hosted the sixth in-person meeting of the University of Sussex’ Teaching with AI Community of Practice. In a change to previous sessions, we focused on providing opportunities for all attendees to reflect on their professional use, understanding and perspectives of AI. The atmosphere was positively buzzing with conversation, creativity and collaboration as colleagues from across the university’s faculties and divisions shared their insights. 

This report of the session runs quite long, but is not a challenging read. We hope you find it interesting. There are links below to where different activities are discussed.

Format of the Event

Tables were arranged with five separate activities with which members of the community were invited to engage. Colleagues were invited to move between the tables and activities as they liked, and were also given two time-checks to facilitate this.  We heard from representatives of the groups during the time-checks which provided further information on the activities.

The activities were:

  • Let’s talk about it – A space to share and ask questions with optional prompts provided.
  • Read All About It! – Three articles were provided to spark conversation, along with some prompts.
  • Be the Expert – Planning the perfect session to support a new colleague to make good use of AI.
  • Practical Hands-on – George, EE’s Senior Learning Technologist, facilitated this opportunity to explore and build AI agents using Microsoft CoPilot.
  • Visual and Artistic Expression – Borrowed and adapted from an activity Mark saw at a JISC event; colleagues illustrated how they perceive AI at Sussex now and in the future.

Click on the activity titles above to learn more about each one and the outcomes.

Let’s talk about it:

The conversation activity uncovered a lot of positive experience with AI, including task refinement and success with asking AI to follow formulaic instructions, and frustrations including AI output being too general and the challenge of knowing whether one can be confident in what is generated. One member of the group, Dr Leonardo Garcia Garcia, shared experience of using AI with students to create CAD images and the colleagues at the table took the opportunity to try this for themselves, comparing Gemini (Google) and CoPilot (Microsoft) and evaluating how the different platforms performed the same task of illustrating a gear. This was an excellent example of the value of having these tools at our fingertips while we’re discussing them, and how crucial it is to critically and experientially engage with generative AI by comparing output across platforms and to what an expert would expect, and adjusting our input – for instance by giving an example – to improve the result.

Two outputs from GenAI models, Microsoft CoPilot and Google Gemini, showing illustrations created by the platforms in response to the prompts to draw a CAD image of a gear. The Gemini example is more detailed, but both are inaccurate.

Microsoft CoPilot (left) and Google Gemini (right) CAD-style renderings of a gear.

Microsoft CoPilot (left) and Google Gemini (right) CAD-style renderings of a gear. While the illustrations may look convincing, Dr Garcia Garcia was able to identify faults in the design and in the formatting.

Read All About It!:

The reading activity started quietly as the colleagues at that table took the time to study the article they chose to engage with. The structure was quite loose; colleagues were welcome to read and consider the texts on their own or to select a text they could discuss as a group. It seemed to develop quite naturally that colleagues who chose the same article were drawn to explore it together, while some were more inclined to work independently. The three publications were:

The colleagues at the reading table reported in their notes that it was reassuring to read in the Gallup poll that Gen Z (generally considered to be people born between 1997 and 2012) seem more aware of the contentious issues of using AI but that their concern that AI use risks replacing human skills rather than enhancing them must be taken seriously. Suggestions were made that Sussex must emphasise how AI can be used to enhance student experience and outcomes, if it is used at all, and that the university must ensure that suitable training is implemented across the institution.

Professor Luckin’s post, which was in response to Alex Imas’ Ghosts of Electricity articleWhat will be scarce? was well-received, but didn’t generate much reaction as Luckin is essentially making the point that so many of us in Sussex’s Teaching with AI Community of Practice already understand – that while AI and automation has a place in education, the value that comes from the elements that only humans can deliver must be preserved. (Luckin cautions that the relational goods in education are devalued if AI is perceived to have “leaked” into them.) The hard task we should all be asking is where those distinctions lie: “where, in this institution, does human provenance matter?”

It was the article from The Spectator that generated the most discussion, probably because it is a polemic against the ills of AI and “lazy” students who use it. Sussex colleagues, as ever, identified the unfairness in the piece: that there are numerous reasons a student might be tempted to explore how generative AI could solve a problem for them in the moment, that not all students have equal access to such tools and this disadvantages students who cannot employ expensive or sophisticated systems, that actually the advent of AI only makes it more crucial that we develop assessments that are proportionate and relevant, and so on. Members of the CoP who are far from enthusiastic about adopting AI, rallied to the defence of the hypothetical students Hamilton labelled “lazy” and tore to shreds the points the author tried to make about in-person exams and removing anonymous marking. Reading the piece was useful though as the rhetoric about AI and universities published in a magazine that features in the Top 10 of current affairs titles in the UK (Press Gazette, 2026) is not something we can afford to ignore. Colleagues’ suggestions for Sussex are to ensure that information pages for staff and students, with a clear position on responsible use of AI and what this means, are made available and explicit, not hidden behind passwords and logins. Colleagues agreed that while the issue Hamilton writes about is sector-wide, we need a “cohesive, strategic approach…integrated into our policies” and that “some students will use AI; we [Sussex] need to adapt”.

Photograph of four people sitting at a classroom-style table reading printed articles.

One of the iterations of the Reading Table group (colleagues moved between activities as the session went on)

Be the Expert:

The “Be The Expert” activity invited colleagues to position themselves as the expert expected to provide a 30 minute training or coaching session for a new colleague joining their team in September 2026, with a focus on how the new starter could use AI to directly support their work or to improve student experience.  Prompts were provided, including variables such as what would change if the session were completely theoretical with no practical element, or if the session were extended to include multiple attendees.

 We had two responses to this activity, one by a teaching colleague who worked independently and one by a group comprising colleagues from across specialisms. The teaching example included suggestions such as using AI to support initial subject research, future trends, fact-checking, lesson planning and giving students examples of poor AI output for them to critique and learn from. The group example included reference to our institutional resources such as Skills Hub, the Library, assessment and academic integrity guidance, Employability and Entrepreneurship and wider research on how students use AI. The two responses demonstrated how AI can be used well to support students and staff at Sussex, and how our response is developing across the university. Both responses made the point that details regarding permitted or prohibited use of AI must be transparent, and that while using AI is not automatically misconduct, we have a responsibility to set clear expectations.

My observation was that while this was initially a less popular activity, colleagues who approached it after completing the reading activity seemed more prepared to tackle it, which highlights how important it is that experts have the chance to engage with literature and data, developing their own scholarship, before being expected to deliver training or advice to others.

Practical Hands-on:

The Practical Hands-on activity was facilitated by George Robinson, EE’s Senior Learning Technologist, and provided the opportunity for members of the CoP to explore and build AI agents using Microsoft CoPilot. George’s encouragement, vast knowledge and enthusiasm were perfectly suited to this task as he put colleagues at ease and encouraged them to give it a go.

 What started as a small one-on-one session soon grew as colleagues became more confident to join George and learn from him.

A photograph showing two people working together at laptops.  The facilitator (George) is demonstrating on one device and watching the colleague complete the same activity on theirs.

George Robinson, Senior LT, guided and supported colleagues to build AI agents using Microsoft CoPilot.

Colleagues were surprised how easy the process turned out to be, and recognised that while this is certainly a point in favour, such ease also calls for caution: we must be careful not to become mindless in our interaction with the technology.

Visual and Artistic Expression:

Finally, the Visual and Artistic Expression activity, which was borrowed and adapted by Mark Thomas from one he saw at a JISC event, invited colleagues to illustrate how they perceive AI at Sussex now and in the future. Mark provided useful prompts to include in the artwork and to guide reflection, which were:

  • Draw the present – Sussex as it is today in terms of digital tools and its use of AI. Show how people experience AI: what works, what doesn’t and where challenges exist.
  • Draw the future – Sussex 5-10 years from now where AI is working at its best. Show what has changed, how people experience it, and what makes it successful.
  • Reflect – what are the key differences between the two drawings?
  • Barriers – what is stopping us from moving from the current picture to the future one?
  • Strategy Link – What would we need to prioritise to make the future picture a reality?

A photograph showing people working at a classroom-style table, creating illustrations.  There are lots of coloured pens and the people are discussing their ideas.

The visual/artistic activity proved very popular and generated a lot of conversation and reflection among attendees.

Perceptions of current AI use at Sussex were varied, but the common themes reflected the uncertainties and conflicts that we would expect so early in a paradigm shift. A desire for clearer institutional guidance was evident, as was concern that risks such as threats to academic integrity, critical thinking, environmental resources and equity are not being sufficiently addressed.  


Illustration of the present showing a stick figure crossing a ravine where the only support is the letters A and I. The letters are shaky and the person is unsteady. It is necessary to cross the AI bridge to reach a building the other side of the ravine. Another stick figure stands on the side before the ravine and looks concerned.

In this thought-provoking example, AI is depicted as shaky ground separating people from reaching a destination. The building the person is trying to reach could represent employment (I read “Ltd.” on the roof) or another goal. It is clear that the artist views AI as a necessary but insecure part of the path to reaching the target. The person has to traverse the landscape without a guide who has gone before, but they do have a companion who might be encouraging them or urging caution.

Illustrations of how members of the Teaching with AI Community of Practice perceive AI at Sussex in the present. a) a building on fire, on a cliff about to fall in the sea. b) representations of money, time and intellect bowing to a representation of AI as a TV on a podium. c) wavy water representing extreme AI attitudes, including a shark fin. d) a battleground of AI enthusiasts and opposers. e) a representation of our AI tools being used without complete confidence or consistency.  a representation of seeds underground.

Illustrations of how members of the Teaching with AI Community of Practice perceive AI at Sussex in the present.

When asked to consider how AI at Sussex might look in the 2030s, the responses were mostly optimistic that the university will find a way to adopting informed and equitable use. A well-resourced and human-centred experience is envisioned, informed by initiatives such as the Sussex Academic Framework, with discernment and balance.

 However, visions of the future did also include a stark warning about what we stand to lose if AI is allowed to overrun our values and our world: the threat to the natural environment is referenced, and the depiction of Sussex’s Arts A building alight drives home the risk to our creativity.

I was particularly struck by this illustration by Helen Todd, the Learning Technologist who supports Sussex’s Online Distance Learning provision, which shows AI as a tool used by skilled humans for the benefit of our community:

An illustration depicting AI as a plough being operated by a human proficient in the work.  The land is fertile.  There is a note that the plough has been fashioned from the swords of conflict depicted in the artist's vision of the present state of AI at Sussex. AI Swords into ploughshares Isiah 2:4.

Illustration of the future

For reference, Helen’s vision of the present situation with AI is the illustration depicting conflict between opposing camps, while “thoughtful engagement” tries to achieve peace.

Illustrations of how members of the CoP perceive AI at Sussex in the coming decade.<br />
a) more resource being used well, with teachers more confident and some tasks streamlined.  The seeds from earlier have grown into shoots.<br />
b) the stick figures from before, this time the A I letters are stable and easy to climb, and colleagues further along can confidently encourage new adopters.<br />
c) AI breaking through a wall, removing barriers, and leading to an inclusive and happy future.<br />
d) Arts A is on fire, and our Meeting House is dwarfed by a monolith to AI with risks such as water scarcity and devaluing of creativity carved on the plinth.<br />
e) calmer waters than before, but still with some waves.  The shark has been replaced with a sheep representing reduced risk.

Illustrations of how members of the Teaching with AI Community of Practice perceive AI at Sussex in the coming decade.

In terms of the barriers we are facing, and what members of the CoP understand to be priorities for achieving confident and critically informed use of AI, the number one call was for support for colleagues and students to develop their AI Literacy and their wider Digital Skills, echoing the second of our Principles for AI in Education which were published in Summer 2025.

Summary and Next Steps for the CoP

The 6th meeting of the Teaching with AI Community of Practice was a success, generating much discussion and providing time and space for colleagues to reflect on how they have worked with AI throughout 25/26, and what they would like to try for 26/27.  The activities and the structure was well-received and I really valued the chance to learn from everyone who came along.

Feedback on the session, and what colleagues would like to see from us in the future is invited on the MS Form here Teaching with AI Community of Practice – What’s Next for 26/27?.

You may view the resources we provided for the session here https://sussex.box.com/s/knm67qntxrt95l3bdfl6klrigr27lf14. If you would like to use them for your own event, we’d appreciate a credit.  

 

Across the Sector

The University of Surrey have announced that AI is to be embedded in discipline-specific ways in every Surrey degree from September 2026. Read more here: Surrey embeds AI in every degree from 2026.

JISC’s HE AI Community Meetup took place on 11th June. Read more about the topics here June HE AI community meetup – Artificial intelligence where you’ll see a lot of the perspectives at Sussex are echoed across institutions.

Further Afield

Coming up on 5th July, the BBC podcast The Artificial University will feature Kathryn Claire Higgins, a working academic in the UK, who wants to raise an alarm and ask “can university education survive AI?” Tune in here: BBC Radio 4 – Currently, The Artificial University.

Announcements were made by the UK Government during London Tech Week, including details such as UK infrastructure, online safety and defence. The announcements were covered by The Guardian here: UK sets out AI infrastructure push at London Tech Week – how does it stack up? | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian


  • Join the Teaching and Learning with GenAI Community: If you’d like to join the community and be first to hear about events. Get in touch with us and we can add you to the list and dedicated MS Teams community. www.tinyurl.com/sussex-ai-cop
  • Disclaimer on any tools not supported at Sussex. Please do not share Sussex, student, colleague, sensitive or personal data via these platforms. Not being supported means they have not passed stringent Data Protection assessments and could put you at breach of policy and legislation. For a list of supported platforms for teaching and learning please visit the Educational Enhancement website.

This was a Spotlight on AI in Education update from Educational Enhancement

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Blog, Newsletter, Uncategorised

Embedding student consultancy projects in first year of Philosophy degrees

Picture of Sarah Sawyer

In this case study, Sarah Sawyer, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sussex and former Head of Department, talks about the process, drivers and impacts of introducing a student led consultancy project into a year one, semester one module.

What I do: 

In 2025/26 we embedded a student consultancy group project into our semester 1 ‘Reason and Argument’, undergraduate module. The module, which typically has around 70 students, is core for all first year Philosophy students, including joint honours and PPE (Philosophy, Politics and Economics) students.

The module is structured in two halves. In the first half, we teach students some core philosophical skills around critical thinking and analysing arguments, and how bad arguments are used in journalism, media, marketing and social media to persuade or manipulate. In the second half, students apply their learning through the student consultancy project, which was set by an industry expert, who in this case was from Microsoft.

They asked our students to develop a policy on ethical AI use for university students and staff. Working in groups of 5-6, students developed and presented their policy back to the industry expert, who was able to ask them questions and provide some on the spot informal feedback. The students also had to produce information leaflets for both staff and student audiences. We used Buddycheck, the University’s peer evaluation app, to encourage engagement and, importantly, to provide students with their own and others’ teamwork contributions. Finally, students were also required to construct a CV and encouraged and supported to articulate skills they had developed through the consultancy project.

Through this process, students were able to apply what they’d learned in the first half of the semester to a very current problem, develop group and team working skills and presentation skills, think about how different policies might be appropriate for different groups, and practice writing for different audiences. They received a range of different kinds of feedback on their contributions and outputs.

Why I did it: 

The main driver was to find a way to embed more employability within our curriculum. The student consultancy approach came out of a conversation with Emily Huns (Head of Careers, Employability and Entrepreneurship) whose team have a lot of experience in this area. They’ve now been working with a range of industry partners over a number of years to develop both tailored curriculum-based projects and extra-curricula, interdisciplinary, student-led consultancy projects, so they have a model we could follow and were able to help us engage our industry expert.

Another driver is the fact that philosophy is often misunderstood in terms of its relevance to work, including by our students. I want them to see, from their very first term, that the skills they are developing are valued by employers. Having someone from a major technology company explicitly say “we want you, not just coders” is an incredibly powerful message for them to hear at the start of their course.

Also, I think first year, and especially first term, is the ideal place to do this. Our students don’t yet have fixed expectations about assessment, so it is easier to be bold. It also gets them working in groups early, builds confidence, and establishes a sense of belonging. First year marks do not count towards the final degree, so the assessment is relatively low stakes while still being meaningful.

There were also some secondary benefits I had hoped for. The project helps students recognise and articulate the skills they are developing, addressing the ever-present question of “what am I going to do at the end of my degree?” right from the start. It also supports attendance, as students have an ongoing commitment to their group over several weeks and understand that not turning up affects others, not just themselves.

How it went: 

The student consultancy project was received very positively. The department was enthusiastic, and the industry partner was generous with their time, checking in with students at the start, midpoint and end of the project, which really helped our students stay on track and modelled professional ways of working.

Students engaged well with the brief and produced thoughtful, nuanced policies that recognised the appropriateness of different uses of AI in different contexts. Asking them to write information leaflets for staff and student audiences proved particularly valuable, as it forced them to translate abstract reasoning into accessible communication.

BuddyCheck worked well to support fairness and reflection in group work. Students were prompted to think actively about their own contributions and those of others and the tool gave us evidence in the rare cases where group work was uneven.

And, last but not least, having done this project in their first year, I suspect our students will be more likely to participate in the extra-curricular student consultancy projects for which they can get paid and benefit from opportunities to work with students from across a wider range of disciplines.

What I might change: 

The core structure will remain the same, but one area we are developing further is how we support students when groups aren’t functioning well. While rare, there are occasionally groups where one or two members contribute very little, leaving others carrying the work. Students fill in BuddyCheck after the deadlines so we’re going to provide clearer escalation routes and more proactive support when problems arise, encouraging students to let us know early rather than struggling on in silence.

Three top tips for others wanting to do the same: 

  1. Be bold in first year. Students are far more adaptable than we sometimes assume, and early experiences set expectations for how they will learn and work throughout their degree.
  2. Embed employability in a meaningful content. Do not bolt it on as an extra. Choose a rich, interesting brief that requires students to apply disciplinary thinking to real world problems.
  3. Prepare students for group work. Even a small amount of explicit discussion about collaboration, presentations and professional skills can make a significant difference, without detracting from academic depth.

Additional information: 

If you’re interested in introducing a student consultancy project into your course or module, or introducing other forms of experiential learning, please contact the Careers and Entrepreneurship team at careers@sussex.ac.uk to discuss the support available.

For more information about opportunities for students, see the student facing information about Career Lab and Student Consultancy Projects.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Assessment and Feedback, Case Studies, Employability

Reflections on the Sussex Education Festival 2026

On 8 May, over 100 colleagues from across the university attended the fourth Sussex Education Festival. This year’s festival was our biggest yet- with more applications to present, and more colleagues attending than any previous year. The content of the talks and discussions highlighted just how much incredible work goes into teaching and learning here at Sussex.

We tried out new formats such as roundtables with student respondents, panel discussions on new university initiatives, and a lunchtime walk and tour of the university’s Forest Food Garden. We also ran a showcase, advertising opportunities to get involved in education and scholarship, alongside projects and resources highlighted in talks during the day

a conference panel discussion of four people, a lady is holding the microphone and the others are listening

After morning pastries and a welcome from Kate O’Riordan, the convenors of the new Progressive Futures flagship electives formed the first session, in a panel discussion also hosted by Kate. We were reminded of Sussex’s rich interdisciplinary history and heard about how rewarding the convenors have found working together to design the new electives. The new modules, based on the three Sussex transformational themes, will be taken by the majority of all new first year undergraduates in the autumn.

We spent the rest of the morning enjoying rich presentations in parallel sessions, on topics such as experiential, creative and playful learning, inclusive pedagogy and using AI in the classroom. The lightning talks offered snapshots of projects, classroom interventions and research, all aimed at improving student experience and the way we teach at Sussex. The full programme can be found here.

At lunch, Perpetua Kirby offered a lunchtime walk. Colleagues took their packed lunch to the Forest Food Garden, to hear more about the opportunities available to use the garden in their own teaching. The team are currently looking for volunteers to help out in the garden- the next volunteering day is on Thursday 30 July.

13 people standing in a semicircle in an outdoor green space listening to a lady in the centre with her back to the camera

The last two parallel sessions of the day focused on building student wellbeing and supporting student transitions into higher education.

We closed the packed day with a roundtable: ‘Build it and students will come? Insights from staff and students on attendance’. The session brought together staff working on student engagement and participation with student connectors, who have received training on curriculum design and worked with fellow students to understand barriers to engaging in teaching sessions. The format wove together staff presentations with rich discussion and insights from student connectors. Our discussions took the outcomes of a recent report by Estelle Marks and Jenny Chanfreau as a starting point. The report uses survey and qualitative data to explore the reasons behind declining student attendance in our classrooms.

a row of 10 people on chairs forming a conference panel session, one student is holding a microphone while the others listen to her

Lara McMurtry, chair of the Education Festival Steering Group, reflected on the day:

It was lovely to see so many colleagues across the institution, sharing ideas, celebrating great practice and engaging in thoughtful conversations about education and student experience. Bringing staff and students together for the closing roundtable discussion felt like a really positive way to end the day. There was a real sense of energy, openness and community throughout, which made this year’s Festival such a big success.

We’ll leave you with Kate O’Riordan’s final reflections:

The Education Festival is a core event in the academic year at Sussex, and has gone from strength to strength. This is thanks to the excellent support from the Educational Enhancement team and the Education and Scholarship Committee. My thanks to everyone involved in this. Highlights this year included:

  • the panel on the progressive futures transformation theme electives, with reflections from the convenors of these modules;
  • and the panel on attendance and belonging which brought together students and staff to reflect on their experiences, and to show case and discuss the really important research at Sussex on this theme.
Also, the badges were great. We’ll be back next year and look forward to welcoming more staff and students from Sussex, and partner organisations to the event.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in community engagement, Education and Scholarship, Events

Build it and students will come? Insights from staff and students on attendance and belonging at Sussex

Dr Estelle Marks (Assistant Professor in Criminology) and Dr Jenny Chanfreau (Assistant Professor in Sociology)

Student attendance is one of the most discussed issues in higher education. While declining attendance is frequently noted anecdotally, there is less clarity about why students attend or don’t attend, and what attendance tells us about engagement. 

In this article, we draw on recent research led by Dr Estelle Marks (Assistant Professor in Criminology) and Dr Jenny Chanfreau (Assistant Professor in Sociology) in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Sussex. Their study offers a nuanced and evidence-informed understanding of student attendance, moving beyond common assumptions and highlighting implications for teaching, curriculum design, and institutional policy. 

Impetus for the project 

The project began in 2024 with a pilot study prompted by observations of highly inconsistent attendance. As Estelle explains, while there were many anecdotal explanations circulating across the University, there was a need to understand what was really going on. To gain a more evidence informed perspective, the team conducted a survey initially within criminology and sociology programmes, before expanding it in 2025 to include all undergraduate students across the Faculty of Social Sciences.  This larger dataset enabled a more robust analysis of attendance patterns and student experience. The survey was sent to all undergraduate students in the Faculty of Social Sciences and received 746 responses. It is a strong sample size, although the response rate itself was relatively low – around 27%, which is typical for online surveys. It is also worth noting that students were being surveyed heavily at that time: final-year students had just completed the NSS, and other students were completing module evaluations, so survey fatigue likely played a role in the low response rate. 

The survey asked students to reflect on a wide range of barriers to attendance, indicating how often these affected them. Importantly, the survey combined quantitative measures with open-ended responses, allowing students to describe their experiences in their own words. 

Students responded to statements about barriers, indicating whether these affected their attendance “never”, “sometimes”, “often”, or “always”. 

Barriers were grouped into three categories: 

  • university-related barriers 
  • individual barriers (e.g. health and wellbeing) 
  • external factors (e.g. work, caring responsibilities, home life) 

A complex picture 

One of the most important findings is that attendance cannot be explained by a single factor. Instead, students experience a cumulative set of barriers that interact with one another. 

Individually, commonly cited barriers include: 

  • seminar anxiety 
  • timetabling challenges, particularly early morning and late evening sessions 
  • financial pressures, including the need to work 
  • travel costs 
  • physical and mental health, disability, and neurodivergence 
Percentage for students in reporting barriers to attendance 'often/always' by attendance quartile. Unsurprisingly, the number of reported barriers differed by attendance group, with almost half of
students in the lowest quartile (Q1) reporting three or more university barriers, almost a quarter
reporting three or more individual barriers and a fifth reporting three or more personal
circumstances barriers affecting attendance ‘often’ or ‘always’. Among the highest attending (Q4)
group the percentages reporting three or more barriers affecting attendance ‘often’ or ‘always’ were:
13% for university barriers, 3% for individual barriers and 6% for personal circumstances.
Notable difference across specific barriers between attendance groups include seminars making
students anxious, preferring to study online, disability, physical illness (with doctor’s involvement),
diagnosed mental health conditions, living a long distance away from campus, having caring
responsibilities and paid work.
Percentage for students in reporting barriers to attendance ‘often/always’ by attendance quartile.

What emerges from the qualitative data is that these are not separate issues. Students experience them as interconnected and reinforcing. For example, a student working long hours may not have time to complete preparatory reading, which increases anxiety about participating in seminars, which then affects attendance. 

Certain student groups are more likely to experience these cumulative pressures. Women, students of colour, mature students, and first-generation students reported higher levels of overlapping barriers. In particular, first-generation students were more likely to need to work alongside their studies, reflecting broader changes in the student population. 

The changing realities of student life 

Perhaps the most significant finding of the research relates to the changing financial context of higher education. As Estelle notes: 

The student loan, even with the maximum maintenance allowance, barely covers basic expenses like rent and food… Only students who receive financial support from family are able to fully dedicate themselves to their studies. 

This financial reality represents a fundamental shift in student experience. While widening participation initiatives have successfully increased access to university, many students now face a new barrier: the cost of living. The majority of students must balance study with paid work, significantly shaping how they engage with their education. Attendance, therefore, cannot be understood without recognising these broader structural pressures. 

Rethinking what counts as a barrier 

Another important insight from the study is that barriers are not objective measures, they are experienced realities. For example, simply living far from campus does not necessarily affect attendance. However, experiencing the commute as difficult or costly does. Similarly, having a disability or learning plan is not, in itself, linked to attendance but how those conditions are experienced, and whether appropriate support is in place, can have a significant impact. 

This highlights the importance of moving beyond “observable characteristics” and engaging directly with students’ lived experiences. As Jenny explains, understanding attendance requires listening to how students themselves interpret and navigate their circumstances. 

A strong theme emerging from the qualitative data is students’ frustration with transport costs. Many expressed palpable anger about rising bus fares and unreliable services, with this frustration sometimes directed towards the University, particularly where timetabling appears not to account for these constraints. Students described having to make difficult trade‑offs, for example, deciding whether to spend money on travel for a short teaching session or to prioritise work and other commitments. Timing further compounds the issue: several students noted that there are not enough buses to reliably get to early morning sessions, yet these sessions remain a fixed part of the timetable. The result is a clear sense of tension, with students feeling that structural factors beyond their control are shaping their ability to attend. 

Attendance and engagement are not the same thing 

A key finding that challenges common assumptions is that attendance is not a reliable proxy for engagement. The research found that reported study time does not differ significantly between attendance groups and students with lower attendance often still describe themselves as highly engaged, for example through reading or engaging with recorded materials. This finding raises important questions about how we define and measure engagement, particularly in a context where students are balancing multiple responsibilities. While there is longstanding evidence linking attendance and attainment, the authors suggest that this relationship needs to be revisited in light of current student realities. Attendance may no longer be an adequate stand alone measure of engagement in contemporary higher education. 

What can teachers do to support attendance? 

Address seminar anxiety 

Seminar anxiety emerged as one of the most frequently reported barriers to attendance. Many students expressed concern about speaking in front of others or being called upon in class. 

As a result, the researchers emphasise the importance of: 

  • creating supportive, low-stakes learning environments 
  • clearly communicating expectations 
  • framing seminars as learning spaces rather than testing spaces 

Students need to feel comfortable making mistakes as part of the learning process and this requires teaching approaches that normalise uncertainty and exploration. As noted in discussion, students may attend but not participate verbally due to anxiety, which raises questions about how engagement is recognised. 

Recognise competing demands 

Many teaching staff are aware that students face increasing pressures outside their studies. However, this awareness needs to translate into practical adjustments and flexibility, where possible. 

This might involve: 

  • reconsidering how preparatory work is structured 
  • acknowledging constraints on students’ time 
  • designing activities that remain meaningful even when preparation is limited 

Make in-person teaching meaningful 

A significant proportion of students reported a preference for online study. In a predominantly in-person institution, this raises an important question: what is the added value of attending in person? 

Departments and teaching teams may benefit from working collaboratively to: 

  • identify what cannot be replicated through recordings 
  • design sessions that emphasise interaction, discussion, and active learning 
  • ensure that attendance feels worthwhile 
  • Think creatively about how to ensure that attending in person feels valuable to students, so that there is a clear added benefit over watching recorded lectures later. 

Institutional implications 

The research also highlights several areas where institutional action could have a significant impact. 

Timetabling 

Students consistently identified timetabling as a barrier, particularly early morning or evening sessions, uneven distribution of teaching across the week and having to travel in for a single short session. At the same time, preferences vary widely, suggesting that there is no simple solution. Instead, the findings point towards a need for clearer communication around timetabling and more predictable scheduling patterns. 

Understanding engagement 

The study suggests that institutions need to move beyond attendance as a primary measure of engagement. While attendance data is widely available, other forms of engagement are less systematically captured. This gap offers an opportunity for institutions to develop more holistic measures of engagement that can explore how engagement is experienced by different student groups. 

Supporting teaching practice 

Finally, the research highlights the value of creating space for staff to reflect on approaches to reducing seminar anxiety and inclusive pedagogies more generally. While support for early-career teachers is well established in the Fundamentals of Teaching and Learning and the PGCert, the findings suggest that these conversations should take place across all levels of experience. 

Moving the conversation forward 

The research provides a foundation for ongoing discussion about student attendance and engagement at Sussex and beyond. While the study focuses on the Faculty of Social Sciences, its findings resonate more broadly across disciplines and institutions. For colleagues interested in learning more the full report is available below and provides detailed analysis and recommendations. The hope is that it will be read, discussed, and used to inform practice at multiple levels, from individual modules to institutional strategy.

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Articles

Spotlight on AI in Education: April & May 2026

AI generated image of A girl looking at wires

Welcome to April and May’s 2026’s Spotlight on AI in Education bulletin. With how fast things are moving, this will help you cut through the noise and catch what’s important. The bulletin highlights on-the-ground practice, institutional perspectives, and trends in generative AI use across the sector and beyond. We hope you find this useful.

If you have anything you’d like to contribute or see in this bulletin, please email EE@sussex.ac.uk

On-the-ground at Sussex 

Sussex Education Festival 2026  

The fourth Sussex Education Festival happened last week at the Student Centre.  

The festival is for anyone involved in delivering education at Sussex and provides a supportive and collaborative space to celebrate and share experiences, research and reflections on teaching, learning and assessment. This year was a well-attended event with lots of interesting and thought-provoking talks on a range of topics.  

There were three AI sessions as part of the programme  

1.Using an AI-generated reception class to enhance deliberate practice in initial teacher Education. Using an AI-generated reception class, Hayley Preston-Smith explored how trainee teachers could safely practise classroom activities, behaviour management, report writing and other early-years skills, while also benefiting from peer reflection and more equitable learning experiences.

2.Teaching gen-AI prompting to develop science communication skills. Greig Joilin (Life Sciences) Greig examined how teaching students to use and critique generative AI prompts can support science communication skills, while highlighting the need for stronger critical thinking, self-evaluation, and a staged AI literacy curriculum across degree programmes.

3.Designing with AI: A backward -design and TBL approach focused on inputs, not outputs. Gabriella Cagliesi (USBS) Gabriella argued that, through backward design and clear pedagogical rules, AI can move beyond being a passive chatbot to become an active teaching partner that supports questioning, reflection, communication and critical engagement with AI-generated answers. 

Next AI Community of Practice 8th June  

The Teaching with AI Community of Practice will meet again Monday 8th June, when we look forward to hosting a salon-style event with opportunities to reflect on 2025/26 and discuss your ideas, experiences and questions with each other. 

We will meet in-person on the University Campus, in the Library Teaching Room (Ground Floor, by the step-free access next to IDS). Please register to attend here: Completing the form is particularly useful for us to accommodate any access requirements. 

Read more about our previous AI CoPs on the blog.

AI in education hub 

Please review our new and improved AI in education hub. Here you will find everything you need to know about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching, learning and assessment at The University of Sussex. 


Self-enrol to Educational Enhancement’s Canvas module “AI at Sussex” 

Sussex staff and students only) to support your use of AI in your teaching and learning, Please remember that CoPilot and other tools are constantly being developed, and the material might not always reflect how the tool operates on a given day. 

The JISC Building Digital Capabilities Toolkit is available to all Sussex staff and students, and includes guidance on how to improve your own digital skills. Access the toolkit here. The specialised question set looking AI focuses on 

  • AI and digital proficiency 
  • AI and digital productivity 
  • AI and information and data literacy 
  • AI and digital communication 
  • AI and collaboration and participation 
  • AI and digital creativity 
  • Responsible AI 

You can read more about the University of Sussex principles on AI here.

Find out more and book your place on the Summit.


 Across the Sector 

Topic: “Is AI the new plastic?” 

From my reading this month the concept of values and our AI driven future have come up on both the micro and macro level and ultimately looking at the enduring quality of AI use. Here are two articles talking about this subject: 

Values-led Generative AI in Design Education: A Toolkit for Confident, Critical Practice 

In this post it looks at how Nottingham Trent University, University of the Arts London, and Norwich University are exploring generative AI and how it is reshaping art and design education. They are attempting to respond by developing practical support to help students and staff integrate AI tools confidently while addressing authorship, ethics, originality, and creative practice. [altc.alt.ac.uk]

The resulting open Art, Design & Artificial Intelligence: Educator’s Toolkit offers design-cycle activities, case studies, and reflective “spark card” prompts grounded in nine shared AI design values (e.g., human creativity first, transparency, inclusion, process over output) to encourage critical, values-led use of generative AI in teaching.  

This statement resonated with me and is something I wish to explore more. “Whilst technologies evolve rapidly, the values cultivated through creative, critical and material practice are more enduring” These kind of activities described in the article put the process and the skills front and centre while taking emphasis off the final product are important reminders, for me personally, as I develop my professional work with AI as tool to support.  

The tensions of AI shouldn’t come as a surprise in a system wired for speed and output 

In this WonkHE article the author talks about the tension in the HE sector about AI use isn’t just about governance or a policy problem, they argue it’s a “dopamine problem,” because AI offers fast cognitive relief (turning friction, uncertainty, and drafting effort into neat output). Instead, universities need to rethink what they value and design for slower, difficulty, revision, and critical engagement especially as AI tools become embedded as invisible infrastructure [wonkhe.com] 

“We have seen this pattern before. Fast fashion was convenient before it was environmentally destructive. Social media was connective before it was corrosive. Plastic was revolutionary before it was everywhere… forever. In each case, the benefits were immediate and personal; the costs were distributed, delayed and easier to ignore. We normalised first and interrogated later.” 

Novelty, assistance and potential embarrassment: patterns of change in AI use amongst teachers. April 2026 

Martin Compton’s article looks at a 12-month-old post asking ‘What GenAI tools can do well’ has had hundreds of responses from educators around the world. Compton later asked contributors in the post “……What are your top personal and/or professional uses of generative AI tools?” 

Compton reports” The teachers, lecturers and students shared examples of what they were doing, along with anxieties and uncertainties. These comments revealed messy, sometimes confused pictures that reflect anything but consensus. Rather than any sort of transformation either to digital utopia or intellectual ruin there is nevertheless a sense of change over time that suggests increased normalisation and experimentation alongside heightened wariness.” [HEducationist] 


Further Afield 

Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD) 21st May 2026  

Global Accessibility Awareness Day, is a worldwide initiative that encourages everyone to talk, think, and learn about digital access and inclusion for the more than one billion people living with disabilities. By spotlighting the importance of accessible design across web, mobile, and emerging technologies such as AI, GAAD highlights how inclusive digital experiences can remove barriers and create more equitable opportunities for all.  

For more information about events, news and resources visit the website  

The University of Kent’s Digitally Enhanced Education webinars!  

These webinars are organised into playlists based on different elements of AI use. The employability list has nine episodes with Q&A elements. These are all available for free on YouTube with other playlists focusing on topics about AI digital technologies for teaching


In case you missed it 

Other links on the topic of AI in teaching and learning you may have missed. 

  • Join the Teaching and Learning with GenAI Community: If you’d like to join the community and be first to hear about events. Get in touch with us and we can add you to the list and dedicated MS Teams community.  www.tinyurl.com/sussex-ai-cop   
  • Disclaimer on any tools not supported at Sussex. Please do not share Sussex, student, colleague, sensitive or personal data via these platforms. Not being supported means they have not passed stringent Data Protection assessments and could put you at breach of policy and legislation. For a list of supported platforms for teaching and learning please visit the Educational Enhancement website

This was a Spotlight on AI in Education update from Educational Enhancement 

www.tinyurl.com/sussex-ai-cop 

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Blog, Newsletter

Upcoming education-focused opportunities: teaching, learning, scholarship and pedagogic research

Here is a range of opportunities from across the sector to share educationfocused practice, present work, and publish. Some opportunities require payment and travel, while others are free, and we hope this selection highlights the excellent range of options available to suit different interests and circumstances. 

Conferences, symposia, and events 

(In)equalities in PostCompulsory Education – MiniConference 

  • Date: 2 June 2026, 10.00–15.00 
  • Location: King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2BZ 
  • Format: In person 
  • Cost: Free (booking required) 
  • Focus: Social justice, inequality, resistance, and transformation in postcompulsory education 

This miniconference explores contemporary challenges in postcompulsory education, with a focus on resistance, transformation, and reimagining the future. 

ALDcon26 – Association for Learning Development in Higher Education 

  • Location: University of Leeds 
  • Dates: 12 June and 16–17 June 2026 

ALDcon26 brings together colleagues working in learning development, academic literacy, and inclusive curriculum design. Conference themes include advocating for learning development, disciplinespecific approaches, blended learning, and digital innovation. 

Assessment in Higher Education conference

Theme: Assessment and feedback.

Dates: 18 June – 19 June

Focus: Improving assessment and feedback as a means of enhancing the student experience.

Advance HE Teaching & Learning Conference 2026 

  • Theme: Success by Design 
  • Dates: 30 June – 2 July 2026 
  • Focus: Teaching, assessment, belonging, employability, and institutional change 

A major sectorwide conference with strong alignment to practicebased inquiry and educational enhancement. 

Collaborative Pedagogic Research Symposium 

  • Date: 10 July 2026 
  • Format: Online (Teams) 
  • Theme: Collaborative Pedagogic Research 

This symposium marks the launch of the International Pedagogic Research Network (IPRN), a supportive community for colleagues engaged in pedagogic research, educational innovation, and teachingfocused careers. 

2nd International Conference on Innovative Teaching and Education (ITECONF 2026) 

  • Dates: 17–19 July 2026 
  • Location: London 
  • Focus: Innovative teaching practice, curriculum design, and pedagogic research 
  • Call for papers: Open 

ITECONF welcomes both empirical research and reflective, practicebased contributions from academics and educators. 

EdTec – International Conference on Education & Learning Technology 

  • Dates: 22–23 November 2026 
  • Location: London 
  • Focus: Digital pedagogy, learning technologies, assessment, and inclusion 
  • Call for papers: Open 
Shape

Writing and publishing opportunities 

Call for Book Chapters – Empowering Graduate Skills in the Age of Augmented Intelligence 

Editors: 
Dr Christine O’Dea (King’s College London) 
Dr Davy Tk Ng (The Education University of Hong Kong) 
Dr Jac Ka Lok Leung (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) 
Dr Mike O’Dea (University of York) 

This forthcoming Emerald Points edited volume focuses on creative pedagogies and graduate skills development in the age of augmented intelligence, with an emphasis on crossdisciplinary case studies. 

Key details: 

  • Chapter length: up to 3,000 words 
  • Focus: practical case studies of creative pedagogy involving AI 
  • Expression of Interest deadline: 30 May 2026 
  • Draft chapter: 1 August 2026 
  • Final chapter: 1 October 2026 
  • Publication: January 2027 

Ongoing scholarship and sector platforms 

International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) 

ISSOTL supports faculty, professional staff, and students who view teaching and learning as serious intellectual work, and provides international infrastructure for SoTL research, writing, and collaboration. 

Write for Wonkhe 

Wonkhe publishes commentary and analysis on UK higher education for a readership of highereducation professionals across academic, professional services, and policy roles. 

Times Higher Education (THE) Campus 

THE Campus is a knowledgesharing community focused on teaching and learning in higher education. Contributions include concise guides, evidencebased explainers, case studies, reflective pieces, and leadership insights. 

Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning Journal 

This journal addresses pressing questions of access, equity, social exclusion, and lifelong learning in education, engaging with national and international policy and practice. 

Tagged with:
Posted in Blog

Episode 15: Student attendance in higher education

The Learning Matters Podcast captures insights into, experiences of, and conversations around education at the University of Sussex. This podcast episode is hosted by Prof Wendy Garnham and Dr Heather Taylor. It is recorded monthly, and each month is centred around a particular theme. The theme of our fifteenth episode is ‘student attendance in higher education’ and we hear from Jeanette Ashton (Associate Professor in Law), and Dr. C. Rashaad Shabab (Reader in Economics).

Recording

Listen to the recording of Episode 15 on Spotify

Wendy Garnham

Welcome to the Learning Matters Podcast from the University of Sussex, where we capture insights, experiences, and conversations around education at our institution and beyond. Our theme for this episode is Attendance in Higher Education. Our guests are Jeanette Ashton, Associate Professor in Law and Dr Rashaad Shabab, Reader in Economics. Our names are Wendy Garnham and Heather Taylor, and we are your presenters today. Welcome, everyone.

All

Hello, everyone.

Heather Taylor

What issues have you observed regarding student attendance in your modules or courses?

Jeanette Ashton

I think in terms of my particular modules, this term, they’re a little bit different. So I’ve got a new module which is called Professional Skills and I’ll talk about that a bit later, it’s a different approach, attendance and engagement has been really good and perhaps that’s because the module is a little bit different. I think from talking to colleagues in my department there’s been challenges with attendance in other modules and then we have the tension as well with the attendance now which has been made compulsory so whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing, or somewhere in the middle, perhaps we’ll get into that a little bit later, but I think perhaps the prevailing view is that attendance is a challenge.

Rashaad Shabab

This is a crucially important question and one that we’ve struggled with quite a bit in the Business School. For the type of subjects that we have, it’s absolutely critical that students are in the room learning those skills and make learning how to sort of present, how to interact with other students and things like that. But what we have seen was that after COVID and specifically, there was a marked drop in the rate of attendance in classrooms. This is difficult, both as an educator because you want people to show up and it’s hard not to take it personally that they don’t see the value in my sort of being there, right?

But it’s also difficult, I think, for us as an institution, as a learning community, where so much of what we aspire to teach our students is from getting people from different backgrounds and different communities together to hash through the grand challenges of our time. And without having those different backgrounds in the room, those, particularly seminar and workshop sessions, lack the dynamism that they otherwise would have. So it’s definitely a challenge. It is something that has improved, I think, in the most recent cohorts. So in my classes now, I’m seeing a marked improvement, in attendance, but this may also be related to some work that we’ve done over the last 3 years in improving attendance, in the Business School. I think that’s something we might sort of come up come back to, in a later question. But, yes, I think there are there are lots and lots of difficulties that students seem to be facing, in terms of trying to get to class and being comfortable in class and being in a position where they feel like they’re making valuable and important contributions to class.

Jeanette Ashton

I think that’s really yeah, those are all really good points, Rashaad. Prior to this I asked my class that I was teaching who are, they’re a group of students who are studying what used to be known as the Law Conversion, so they’re post graduate students studying law so perhaps they’re not representative of our larger cohort which is of course undergraduate students and I thought well I’ll just ask you, I know I’m doing this podcast, I’ll ask you why are you here? And they didn’t share why they were here in an existential sense unfortunately but they did say that things that led them to come to the class was the timing of it, it was a nice time 11:00 not too early not too late. They also said that if the reading and the prep that they’re asked to do is useful and helps them to feel confident with the subject matter, they feel that they want to come, which I found really interesting. If they found or they felt that the class was going to be useful for them generally and particularly for their assessment. They also talked about if a class was such, delivered in such a way that they felt comfortable to come even if they weren’t fully prepared and that was really important. That they felt there was that enabling environment I suppose,  that they wanted to come and that they weren’t going to feel too judged or picked on or whatever if they hadn’t done all of the work.

Wendy Garnham

I think that’s really important actually in terms of giving students that sort of confidence that actually there is something to be gained from attending – that it’s not just something you can do by looking at the slides online or looking at a recording that actually being physically present and engaging in a sort of a really, interactive way is absolutely key.

Rashaad Shabab

And I really like the point that you made, when you were sort of ending what you were saying about organising the class and the teaching session in such a way as to not alienate students who, for whatever reason, haven’t been able to do the reading. I think that’s really, really crucially important. I think sometimes we want to push students to do the reading. It is a very fine line. We want to reward the ones who do. We want to give them a voice and we want to make students feel like that effort is valued. But at the same time, if we emphasise that sort of too much or in a manner that pitches it as something that should be punished if it’s not done, then perhaps that can alienate students who for whatever reason are already struggling to engage. So I really, really think that’s a very important point. Thank you for making it.

Jeanette Ashton

I know and we don’t want to, you know, that cycle of disengagement then, someone doesn’t come and then they don’t come again, then it’s harder to come again, isn’t it? So you want to try and avoid that I guess.

Heather Taylor

Yeah. It’s so hard finding the balance I think, like, I know at the moment my students have got an assessment, well loads of assessments due, and they – I knew that they wouldn’t do the reading, and it was a deliberately short one. As I get towards their assessment period, I make the reading short. Well, I don’t make them obviously, but I pick ones that are short. So that it’s not going to take them too long to read it. But also, I literally had a situation where I think maybe two of the students in the class had done the reading. And so I knew this was going to happen. And part of me making it deliberately short was that they could read it in the lesson. So I was like, we can’t do the rest of the lesson till you’ve read it. These are the bits you have to focus on. We’re all going to read it now. And I’m a really slow reader. So I read it and I was like, by the time I’m done, everyone else should be done. And they were and it worked that way. And the ones that had already done the reading, it was fine because we had some more, like, discussion activities later on that they like to contribute to more, I’d say, than the other students anyway. So they could just discuss those with each other while we were going. But I think it’s really hard because you don’t want to say don’t bother doing the reading, you know, because it is annoying when you’ve set up a lesson a certain way, for that to be the case, for no one to do it. But, yeah, I think thinking about when are the pressure points for students in term, thinking about does it have to be such a long reading, does it have to be so tricky, can I factor in a bit of time in class to get them to do some of it, so, yeah? It’s like a tricky balancing act, isn’t it?

Rashaad Shabab

I think this is the core thing that I would like to get across to students, and I actually make a pretty deliberate attempt in a number of different structural ways to get this point across. We mention it at our induction events, I mention it in our first lectures, and I mention it repeatedly throughout, teaching events. Really, I think the first thing is you learn we’re human beings. We’re not we’re not sort of AIs that can just scan stuff, absorb the knowledge, and regurgitate it. And doing it that way does a disservice to what education is for. We learn as a community. We learn together with one another, and we learn not a very small fraction, but I’d say possibly half of what we teach in universities, when we take teaching in a holistic sense, is, you know, stuff that’s on a bit of paper. The rest of what students get out of a university education is from being present in that room with one another, From having sort of multiple, role models almost of professionals, of learned people who they can, sort of say that these are the behaviours, these are the attributes, this is how you run a room, this is how you manage a room, this is how you interact with a group of people who are different from you, who you don’t already know and, you know, don’t necessarily have lots and lots of other things in common with. I think those skills are sort of crucially important for students to pick up. I think it when students engage with the learning material in an interactive sense, and Wendy, I know you’ve done a lot of work on this, through the Active Learning Network. I mean, active learning is the best form of learning, and that a lot of that happens in the classroom.

So I think students are able to academically perform their best when they, attend class and when they’re exposed to the material in a number of different ways. Yes. They have the readings. Yes. They have the slides. Yes. They have the videos and things that we put up online. Yes. They have links to external sites. But also, they have that discursive, interactive, personal community element of the learning as well, which helps them get more out of it. So I think that – and the evidence is I mean, to me it seems incontrovertible that the students who have the best attendance do the best, the students who on average have the worst attendance tend to not do so well. There’s clear sort of empirical support for these assertions.

In terms of what people may be surprised to learn is that in terms of career progression, there’s also quite a lot of empirical support for, the idea that these soft skills have a premium. The Nobel Prize winning economist James Heckman, he won the Nobel Prize in the year 2000. He has a very influential paper that he called the Hard Evidence on Soft Skills. Right? And James Heckman is, I mean for economists who know, he is a hardcore, hard skills, you know, Nobel Prize winning economist in econometrics. So it’s not that he undervalues hard skills or that it’s not his particular sort of comparative advantage, but if even James Heckman can do a bunch of empirical work and come to the conclusion that the soft skills lead to career success and explain a significant portion of the variation that we see in people’s employment outcomes and wage outcomes, then I really think that’s really, really compelling.

There’s also some important evidence I think in terms of there’s university education in the public discourse is much maligned nowadays, but I think there’s really compelling evidence that actually going to university and doing it well and engaging with university provides very, very strong career payoffs. So I’ll just, float a few statistics your way if you don’t mind. These are from a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, who found that the lifetime sort of earnings for people who go to university are £430,000 more for men, £260,000 more for women over their lifetimes. When you compare like for like, so people who could have gone to university but didn’t, so people who were otherwise similarly qualified at the high school level, at their A levels, then that premium drops. But it still remains a not inconsequential £240,000 for men and a £140,000 for women. So going to university and doing it right attracts a very, very significant premium. We’re joined in the room today, with, Jeanette, who’s from Law, so I’m sure she won’t mind me saying this, but, the IFS also found significant variation at the subject level, and subjects like, subjects like Medicine, Economics, and Law have the highest, premiums where, on average, women earn £250,000 more from going to university than if they didn’t, and men earn £500,000 more over their lifetimes.

Wendy Garnham

That’s so huge.

Rashaad Shabab

So these are these are huge premium. These are huge premium, and I think that if students had a better awareness and understanding of just how much university does pay off, I think they would probably be more interested in engaging in this. And also the idea that that a big chunk of that premium is down to the soft skills you learn while you’re here that you cannot learn just reading a paper and doing your work online remotely at home. You need to be in the room to learn those soft skills.

Heather Taylor (14:21)

Could you elaborate a bit on what the soft skills are?

Rashaad Shabab

Universities are hubs of social and economic mobility. We bring together diverse people from diverse backgrounds. Being in a room, learning to work with someone who’s different from you, someone who you might not otherwise connect with, someone who you might not share common things like your favourite movie or your taste in music or where you grew up. But when we all go into the place of work, I mean, it’s hugely diverse, and you need to have the capacity to effectively engage with people with whom you don’t share those sort of high school clique forming, characteristics. And a lot of what we learn in university is learning to interact with people on the basis of sort of something that defines you and unites your group, that is the academic experience, perhaps your subject specialism, perhaps, your shared motivations for building a better society, these things bring you together and they can give an opportunity for people to work toward a common goal even where those other underlying things aren’t there.

I also think it’s crucially important to know how to conduct yourself in a room full of people. I think it’s crucially important to know how to sit, how to, project your voice when you’re speaking, how to disagree with someone without being disrespectful, how to have meaningful exchanges about sort of ideas where you don’t agree with one another and yet be able to do that in a professional way. Every workplace, every managerial role will require people to have these skills. One cannot be an effective manager, one cannot be an effective business person, one cannot be effective in many forms of public service if they’re not able to have those skills. The power of a university is that you get really, really impressive individuals who are able to teach you those skills by embodying them and having them in front of a classroom, while also communicating very, very complex ideas that themselves are intellectually enriching.

Heather Taylor

I was just thinking while you while you were speaking, I was thinking about the fact that some people will listen to this and probably say, oh, but work’s remote now. Everyone works remotely now. You know? But I just think that, I completely agree with everything you’ve just said. And I think, actually, that the distance between people, even if you are working remotely, means that these soft skills need to be harnessed even better because there’s such room for, miscommunication and for things to get lost in emails and even in with the slight lag you get over Zoom. You know, it’s harder to read people and so on. So I think learning these things wherever possible in a real life, people are all together in a room situation enables you to better conduct yourself when you are communicating remotely, and better engage as well.

Rashaad Shabab

Great. I mean, if I could come in on that. I think the remote work is an important part of the economy now. But there is also a swing backwards of the pendulum with many managers, particularly in the kinds of companies where our students aspire to be, right, pushing back on remote work. And even if someone says, well fine, I’ll go for a job that allows me to work remotely, like you were saying, there was actually quite a bit of evidence generated during the pandemic that those micro cues are actually even more important when you’re online than when you’re in person. And being able to hone those skills in an in-person setting can be a much more sort of, supportive atmosphere to hone them than if you’re sort of left alone to do that in in a remote setting where the odds of someone misreading a micro expression. Right? The odds of someone – so people when you teach over Zoom, we had to be much more animated with our faces because we couldn’t use our sort of bodies and our hands or our physical presence in the way we would do, in a classroom. So there is quite a bit of sort of literature on that that sort of says, and the takeaway isn’t that we need these skills less, actually, if you want to be effective working remotely, chances are you might need these skills even more if you’re going to get a remote job to begin with.

Then there’s also the aspect that you want to grow in a career. We don’t want jobs, we want careers. And there’s a lot of evidence also within that Institute for Fiscal Studies report that showed that the premium to university education actually expands by the time people hit 40. Right? It gets even bigger. So you would underestimate it if you just focus on 30 or people at age 30. But what does that depend on? That depends on people being able to rise to managerial positions, being able to manage multiple conflicting sort of views and opinions, and being able to help the institution to move forward in a constructive way. And that again comes down to a combination of hard skills and soft skills. Hard skills alone might get you in the door, but they won’t help you with that rise, which is so important to making sure you benefit from the university premium.

Jeanette Ashton

Can I just jump in on the soft skills point as well? So just to, yeah, build on all those really, crucial points, Rashaad, so I’m one of the employability leads for the Law School and we have an annual employer advisory board and so the idea of it is obviously to feed into the curriculum, to help us to shape learning so that students get the skills that they’re going to need both as you’ve said to Rashaad to get the job but also to thrive in the job. So a lot of what they tell us really is all about young lawyers being too scared to pick up the phone, speak to clients, they all want to hide behind emails and what can we do to encourage that. So what we’ve done sort of bearing that in mind, and I mentioned this already, we’ve got a new Professional Skills Law in Action module, it’s different because it doesn’t have any substantive law attached to it, it’s situated in the context of law and there’s lots of activities that are law-related but, from the beginning of the module the students set themselves up in law firms, they work together every week, there are no lectures it’s all workshops, they define the law firm’s mission and who their clients are and what they want to do and so throughout the whole module which we’ve just nearly finished the first iteration, they’re working in that sort of professional way.

Now embedded in the module is consultancy work so they have spent 3 weeks working on a brief, a live brief for local organisations, so charities in the community. So it’s legal research but they’ve worked on that in their law firms and they have met the organisations, they’ve got the briefs and they have presented back to them and produced some deliverables. Interestingly they’ve had to do all of those things that Rashaad talked about. They’ve had to manage their own team, their own role within the team inevitably there are you know some conflicts that need to be worked through but they all did it, they met the deadline, they did their presentations and the feedback from the organisations has been has been really fabulous, and one of the things the students did which we kind of underestimate this, because we write and receive emails all the time but what they really one of the things they really valued was that we and we cleared it with the organisations, the students sent the deliverables to the organisation so we gave them – you know, we explained how they should write, dear, it was a pleasure working with you but we allowed them to put their own spin on it and that just kind of engaging, meeting professionals, you know being given that level of responsibility has been really powerful for them and they and it’s just been a pleasure really, modules I designed with my colleague, Verona Ni Drisceoil, who I know Wendy knows really well and it’s just been an absolute pleasure because just watching them develop these skills and I think some of the students who selected this module, it’s optional, so we’ve got 60 which was our maximum around 60 at level 5, so second years were perhaps those students who weren’t perhaps the most confident students, that they felt they needed to develop these skills and it’s just been it’s just been so enriching and rewarding.

The assessment is coming up soon and that is they’ve had a 20% participation and engagement on the consultancy work and the rest of it is a work in progress interview where they come to us, they’ve produced a piece of legal drafting and they have to talk through their process, it’s all about the process and then they have to – there’s a fictional role at the law firm that’s come up and they have to showcase their skills and suitability for that role So it’s very, yeah, concerned with process, it’s obviously – and we’ve told them, yeah, okay you can use AI to generate your letter, Go for it. We’ve done some work in the module on, a sort of critical approach to AI. But I said, you know, you can knock out this letter in 5 minutes, but you’re going to be in front of us and we’re going to be asking you some questions about it. So, you know, your choice. So I think, yeah we’ve got the assessments coming up so you know we’ll see how they go but I think the students are just really looking forward to the chance to just have that conversation and do something different so yeah I think absolutely soft skills.

And then that leads to networks and I remember as a trainee solicitor the managing partner at the time saying you know the people that you are with now, your fellow trainees they’re your networks right, they’re going to be your networks for life and I think that’s part of it as well. So those relationships that students build, that we build with them. We might know someone and a student will talk to us about a career aspiration. Oh great if you connect with on LinkedIn and then perhaps you know can you ask them – can I have a 10 minute chat with you – and then things build from there and you only get that from coming in. You don’t get that from you know from not. So, yeah? I totally agree with Rashaad’s points on that.

Heather Taylor (00:26:03)

Oh, yeah. That’s such a good authentic assessment by the way. Yeah. Yeah. The whole thing is great, but I really like the fact that at the end you do a really authentic assessment that’s actually going to benefit them where they can put their skills into it Yeah. That’s great.

Jeanette Ashton

Yeah. Yeah. And what we’ve done as well, which is quite, well it’s different. We’ve done exit tickets for every week. So the exit ticket, you know, the premise is you have to complete it to leave the class. Obviously we don’t lock them in you know we do let them leave, but the exit ticket isn’t we allow them to provide feedback if they want to on the sessions. Great because it’s the first iteration of it but it’s what’s the takeaway and what skill have you worked on and the idea of that is to help them with the assessment and get the buy in with that because they know they’ve got to showcase their skills but also it just really enables them to be reflective. And we talk about that and being reflective and it’s just a sort of mini easy way for them to do that so it’s gone really well like beyond I think what we’d, well probably what we’d hoped but it’s been yeah it’s been great, we’ve loved it.

Wendy Garnham

It’s really interesting actually hearing that because I’ve just been trialling this year with my foundation students a badge scheme to sort of help them to recognise all the soft skills so they get a badge for, well 1 week we did a well-being badge so they had to show that they were considering their well-being alongside their academic work by doing something to promote their sense of well-being.  And another week it was all about learning how to reference properly, another week it might be being creative, so showing their creativity. I mean there’s a whole range of these badges and I did a review with them last week just to sort of see what their feelings were about this scheme and it was really positive but it was really interesting, it wasn’t necessarily in the sense that I thought it would work which was for them to recognise all these skills that they’re developing, it was actually motivation was the key thing they talked at. They found it really motivating in terms of trying to get the badges and trying to get the full quota and so it made them want to attend and it made them want to engage, whereas I thought it would be oh you know now I recognise all these soft skills.

So I think it’s sort of tied up together that actually part of the process of developing those soft skills is quite often just being motivated to sort of have a go, to take part, to participate and if you can sort of – if you can foster that then you can develop all these soft skills really quite easily but effectively. But yeah it just really, it was quite interesting because I thought you know I thought it might motivate them a bit but I thought that the value for them might be in just helping them to recognise the soft skills but it was the reverse, it was the motivation that was the biggest factor they talked about and the recognition it was like oh 50% you know sort of helped me recognise the skills almost as though they sort of already sort of could see what the skills were through being motivated to participate so that’s interesting stuff.

Rashaad Shabab

That is fascinating. I mean it reminds me of this literature on gamification, right, where you take techniques from video game design and you implement that in in education. But you’ve done it in a way there that just make giving that little incentive helps them overcome whatever sort of subliminal barriers there may have been to that engagement. It lets them sort of achieve those skills even though they wouldn’t have been able to overcome that barrier or some of them wouldn’t have been able to overcome that barrier, knowing full well what the skills are because you’re saying that’s not necessarily where the gap that was filled. It’s just that little nudge to help them get over the barrier to engage.

Wendy Garnham

Definitely. It’s even things like, you know, submitting work to get feedback, you know, just getting a badge, you know, even if you’re thinking, oh, I feel a bit sort of despondent about putting my work in or uploading it which a lot of students surprisingly are quite you know sort of nervous about submitting their work for feedback but if you say right you know if you do this you get a badge you know that’s your badge for actually sort of being willing to sort of open up your work for feedback you know and so I had a lot more formative feedbacks which did mean a lot more marking but that’s another story but you know it just – I think that motivation factor we often sort of forget that when they’re attending it’s quite motivating for them to sort of see the opportunities that it opens up and the sort of you know, the way that attending actually is facilitating their learning of all these skills as a sort of a byproduct of that. But, yeah, it is really interesting.

Heather Taylor (00:31:01)

Jeanette, at the beginning, I know you spoke about you asked your students why they were here, so why they attended your session, but on the reverse of that, in your view, what do you think are the main factors that contribute to attendance challenges?

Jeanette Ashton

Inevitably, students are having to do paid work more. There are financial challenges and I think that I know, I know it’s hard, I know it’s challenging timetabling but I think students are not going to come onto campus for 1 hour in a day when they could do paid work and all of the lovely initiatives we do you know the breakfast clubs, the lunch drop ins with food etcetera, is not going to cut it. So I think that is a really big challenge and one that one feel we need to do something about and I think the thing we could most do about that is you know maybe having a little look at the at how timetabling all works, I know it’s really difficult but if students knew ahead of time right in the week I’m coming in 3 days or even 4 and I can work on that other day as well as the weekends I think that would be really helpful.

I think the other, challenge is like I said earlier if some students feeling you know if I’m not prepared depending on who the tutor is they might not feel able to come in, they might feel that they’re going to get, you know, picked on or they’re going to, feel kind of, discouraged from coming along. I think other another challenge is, generative AI inevitably and I think it’s really important that we look at our assessments. I know we’re looking at that but you know inevitably there are going to be some students who don’t come in and you know think and impact rightly so that they can they can work their way through the degree with using ChatGPT and that is something that I know, obviously, the whole sector is wrestling with. So that’s so that’s another point.

And I guess you know just basic things like do they feel a sense of belonging? I think one of the things on the new module, sorry I’m just so excited about it that’s why it’s the one I’m talking about, but where in that module they work with the same students every week. We did ask them – we sort of did a midway bit of feedback – and one of them said he said – and he’s a personable you know outgoing, young man – and he said, ah, I didn’t make any friends on my course last year, that was first year, but I’ve, like, made some really good friends and I thought, well, that says it all, doesn’t it? So actually, you know, you’re much more likely, like Rashaad was saying about forming connections, you’re much more likely to come in if you’re going to be working with people that you like and that you, you know, and that you get on with. So, yeah, I think all of those things and there’s probably a multitude more.

Wendy Garnham   

It’s like that value thing isn’t it, it’s the value added bit of attending, you know what is it that you’re getting from attending that you wouldn’t get without, you know that you would get just from using online things because I think that’s one of the things I think students under appreciate a lot of the time, if they say you know I’m not able to attend but it’s okay because I’ll just look at the slides on Canvas – no you’re sort of you’re missing that value added bit. But, yeah, that is quite a common thing.

Rashaad Shabab

That connection is so important. There’s also evidence from, network analysis in economics that finds that who do you think you’re more likely to get a job sort of connection from? Someone who you’re very close to? Who’s your sort of childhood friend? Or someone who you kind of sort of met, maybe had a class with, maybe did an assignment with and then haven’t spoken to in a while? The answer is it’s actually the second one. It’s the weak social bond who’s more likely to land you that job interview because with your close connections, you share all the same network and the same information to begin with. So they don’t give you any new information. But it’s that weak social bond. It’s building those weak social bonds that help you to secure new opportunities and feed new information into your network. I think it’s an absolutely crucial part of what universities do in our sort of public mission, right?

There’s, just last week I was giving a lecture on intergenerational mobility and what factors, sort of improve intergenerational mobility within certain communities, versus others. And there was this fantastic paper published in Nature by Raj Chetty and his co-authors and what this paper basically found using sort of scraping masses of data from Facebook, using census data, using local level economic data, data on volunteering and all of this sort of wonderful stuff, They found that what matters most for making a community have higher intergenerational mobility, meaning that you get to where your child winds up in the income distribution is less determined by where you are in the income distribution. That’s what I mean by intergenerational mobility. The most powerful factor for that is how diverse are people’s friendship groups, economic connectedness. Do you have people from different socioeconomic backgrounds in your friends group?

And I think, you know, whether you’re on the left or the right, almost everybody agrees that, greater degree of equality of opportunity is something that we should strive for as a society. Universities play a crucially important role in helping society achieve that goal because we bring so many diverse people together and we enable those friendships to be formed. So it’s a crucial part of our social mission and the social value that we bring universities as engines of upward social mobility.

But if students don’t come to class and if they rob themselves of the opportunity to make those diverse friends, they’re robbing themselves of the opportunity for who may have been their business partner, who may have been the connection that landed them that job interview, who may have been their life partner. Right? You’re robbing yourself of all of these opportunities and you’re weakening the university’s and society’s ability to foster higher intergenerational mobility.

Wendy Garnham (00:38:02)

So Jeanette, what strategies or interventions have you implemented to encourage or support student attendance?

Jeanette Ashton

That’s an interesting one. I suppose that’s, I would say that that’s, department kind of level and I guess university level as well. So I mentioned right at the beginning, we have the compulsory attendance in lectures now. Now in Law, that wasn’t compulsory, there wasn’t the pin and all of that, so we have that, I guess that’s a strategy that has encouraged attendance, I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s encouraged engagement but I haven’t been doing any of the big lectures on the big core modules this time around. So that’s one strategy, I guess it’s the whole piece isn’t it? It’s helping students to feel they belong I think and we have a lot of initiatives in Law, in, LPS and the Faculty of Social Sciences, I think there’s a lot of that work going on, yeah and I suppose for the, for my own modules I’ve got pretty good attendance I would say but I think my modules this term are, one of them is Street Law which is part of our clinic and Street Law is a public legal education and we go out into the community and we deliver sessions on you know on the law of interest and the students design those and you know, get out there and deliver them.

So their seminars at 09:00, they’ve all come to all of them because they have to, because they have to practice their sessions because they’re going out to Varndean we’ve done some sessions with. We were in a school in Billingshurst last week working with friends, families and travellers and those young people so they kind of have to because if they don’t come they can’t get out there in front of people and have a positive experience so that sort of drives its own engagement I think and I think the people who select that module they know what they’re in for so you kind of you’re going to get those ones.

Yeah I don’t know about other strategies I suppose we’re always trying to make the case a challenge for me and I know it’s not in in terms of classes but as one of the employability leads a big challenge is getting students along to events that we know are going to be, well they are brilliant, we have an amazing array of events with practitioners and sometimes I feel that I’m spending most of my day doing posts on Instagram, cajoling students, persuading them to come and they do, but I sometimes feel why am I having to do this because it’s so great and you’re going to have such an amazing time and it’s going to be so beneficial. So, yeah, I don’t know. I don’t know, you know, no one’s nailed it, have they, here or anywhere else?

Rashaad Shabab

It is something that, you know, the whole sector, I think, struggles with and I think it’s also something that we we’ve struggled with in the Business School as well. We’ve tried a few things at the Business School level. So, for the last 3 academic years, I was responsible for, sort of our duty of care to students and overall student experience and things like that. And, when we were tracking the data, we actually found that there were a couple of 100 students in the Business School alone who hadn’t attended any seminars or workshops. And that is absolutely astonishing. And we realised very quickly that we needed to reach out to these students. Something was going terribly wrong there. Right? So we have a process called the School Student Progress Panel, where we, sort of ask students to come in who are of very serious concern, and we have a chat with them. A group of academics has a chat with them to figure out how we can help them to re-engage. We had to scale those up. In the year before I went into the Student Experience role, there were only 80 of those in the business school. But within a couple of years, we had to scale it up to 282 SSPPs in one academic year.

Jeanette Ashton

I think that might have been rolled out across the University because we have that now. I know because one of my, students was going along to one of those. So I don’t know if that’s it’s a university wide.

Rashaad Shabab

Yeah. I think it yeah.

Wendy Garnham

My understanding is it still is. But, yeah, certainly we used to have them in Foundation not to the same extent but they are actually really really positive meetings. It sounds as though it’s like a sort of a discipline thing but it’s really not. I mean my experience of them was that quite often students had been really not attending because of some really quite serious issues that actually we have a lot of support available for and that meeting would be like a turning point where actually you’ll say oh you know we can put this support in place and we can do that that might help and we can alleviate that issue and the student leaves with this completely different perspective. And yeah for a lot of students it did turn them from serial non-attenders to attending.

Jeanette Ashton

It’s an early intervention isn’t it? It’s not waiting until the end when they’ve attended nothing, done you know not very well and are feeling thoroughly demoralised, it’s getting in earlier.

Wendy Garnham

Definitely.  It was sort of the basis of our donut model that I’ve talked endlessly about but it was one of our award winning initiatives which was entirely based on that idea of like we have to reach out to the students because particularly students who are really sort of struggling with some pretty significant issues are unlikely to find the time to come and seek us out to try and explain what’s happening but actually us reaching out to them gives them that opportunity really easily to sort of say well yeah actually I am really struggling and you know, and it just it really enabled us to sort of develop a very rounded holistic view of what was happening with our students and what support we might need to develop or and that sort of thing. But, yeah, it is, I think it’s critical.

Heather Taylor

Sometimes as well, it’s about, for the students through these meetings that actually, like, we all have this in life, sometimes everything is too much, and they need to take some time out. And they, and the nice thing about these is it SSPP? Yeah. I hate acronyms, with these meetings, anyway, is that often, the student, with the support from the staff, will actually come to these decisions on their own in a sort of empowered way where they don’t go, oh, I’m going to have to drop out because I can’t do this. They actually feel supported, so they take temporary withdrawal. They come back, and when they come back, it’s like a new person has come back, because they’ve taken the time out to go, these are the things I couldn’t deal with while studying, or these are the things that, you know, studying impacted in my life. And, you know, some of the students have gone on to, like, really do amazingly, haven’t they, from taking that time out. And obviously, we don’t really want people to be withdrawing. Obviously, we’ll try and support them first and foremost, but sometimes, like, that is the right decision, and we’ll support them in helping them come to their decisions around that. And it can be yeah. Really it’s a really beneficial, system. I don’t know if I could do as many as 200 you know?

Rashaad Shabab (00:45:49)

We’ve actually been tracking the data on that. We’re writing up a paper that looks at it in a more structured way, but the preliminary analysis suggests that for at least half of those students, there was a significant increase in attendance and engagement after that. Some of them, yes, there were chronic issues that they needed to address before they could meaningfully engage with their studies. And in those cases, we do – usually in consultation with the student, we’re able to say, well, maybe taking a bit of time off is good for you now. And they say, I didn’t even know we could do that. Right? And they feel empowered and relieved by that. I could think of quite a few cases where, a student got back to me, you know, afterwards and said, I know that two years later, I know that was a difficult conversation to have and it couldn’t have been pleasant, but I just wanted to let you know I’ve graduated with a 2:2 and I couldn’t have done it without that conversation, thanks.

Heather Taylor

Yeah.

Rashaad Shabab

So, yeah, I think universities, we have a duty to really try to sort of, support these students proactively. There are things we can also do in our classroom. Like you were saying, I think, one of the things I’ve done in my class is from the beginning, I let them know that, you know, it’s a safe space. It’s meant for trial and error. Better to get it wrong here than in the exam. You know, we’re here to discuss issues of inequality and things like that. I wanted to do an icebreaker in the beginning where I just asked students, why did you take this module? So that they would, sort of become accustomed to speaking to one another before having to get into really technical, econometric stuff and statistical stuff.

I noticed that a couple of students still didn’t attend, and then I reached out to them at week 3. I said, why haven’t you been attending? One of them said, I got so scared at the idea of having to say why I chose this class, but I didn’t come, and I felt bad going back. And I said, look, I don’t have to call on you. You don’t have to participate. It’s fine, but please do just come along. And since then, that student has been attending.

So I think just showing them that we care, we value them, and it matters, And be that through institutional structures or through individual conveners in our personal teaching, having that shine through, like you were saying, I think it really matters. And of course, there are things like timetabling, and student finance that also really matter here.

I’ll just do a quick little plug about what you’re saying about chronic disengagement. There’s a – I wrote a paper on understanding mathematics anxiety that uses behavioural economics to sort of develop a theory of mathematics anxiety and how students fall into this chronic pattern potentially of disengagement. And the key takeaway from that paper was that chronic disengagement isn’t necessarily chronic, indicative of chronic apathy. Right? Quite often it’s students who care profoundly about their degrees, it’s students who care profoundly about how they’re perceived, who are really really scared and uncomfortable about their academic prospects, who disengage to begin with. And if we can remove some of the threat they feel around that and approach them with some support, then we can really potentially turn those academic careers around. So teaching mathematics and its applications that’s the journal have it written.

Wendy Garnham

I think it’s that sort of fear of failure isn’t it? That’s quite a big player I think in attendance. It’s just we’ve learned that it’s not good to fail where in fact failure is like the root of really effective learning you know that’s the thing that really promotes the best learning – is if you failed you know how to sort of rectify things, you learn really effectively but I think there is, and not just in students I think also in faculty as well there is still this risk aversion and that sort of fear of failure so I think sometimes it’s really good for us to share our experiences so that the students feel more comfortable if they sort of see that there’s this real aversion to risk themselves that actually they can see well actually this is pretty common but at the same time it’s really good to move beyond that and to take the risk and perhaps to fail and at the end of it to end up with this better sort of sense of learning at the end.

So it’s very apt you mention that because I had to take extra lessons to get my Maths O level that’s how old I am and you know I just I really really struggled with maths, really struggled with maths but it was that sense of like I didn’t want to do it because that fear of failure was enormous whereas actually taking those additional, well I didn’t have a choice I had to take the extra lessons, but that enabled me to sort of move a little bit beyond that. I’m still not very good at maths at all but I don’t fear it in the same way that perhaps I feared it initially so I think sometimes it’s good to sort of you know just share with students that this is a really common feeling but actually moving beyond that is really helpful.

Jeanette Ashton (00:51:09)

Also I think the point on the overcoming something, that’s what we hear all the time from employers, and they say that this in the sessions with the students who are there who obviously benefit enormously, they’ll say you know we want to hear that stuff we don’t want to hear necessarily how you’ve sailed through life and you’ve sailed through everything. The interesting things for us are you know how something was a challenge, how things were going on but you know the things you did to overcome it, so that is obviously overcoming something and failing and learning is good in itself but also for going forwards and you know securing a role and moving onwards it’s also really important for that as well isn’t it?  So it’s just getting that across I think.

Wendy Garnham

I think so and just acknowledging that you know there will be difficult things that you are – given a difficult task to try or you know different projects to work on that might you know create some sort of difficulty for you but it’s, the more you sort of practice again going back to those soft skills the more you sort of can network and you feel happy to approach people to ask questions to help you make progress the more effective you become. 

My son has just very recently learnt that, doing an internship at Barclays, and he was given a task where he said I really don’t know where to start with this, however I’m going to go to this person and I’m going to go to that person, I’m going to sort of seek some ideas and he managed to sort of resolve that issue and actually you know completed that task really effectively but it was only through taking the initiative to sort of use these soft skills that he’d developed through his degree that he was able to actually do that, but you know at the starting point it seemed like this really impossible task, this really difficult task and you know his confidence, you know, was really quite low in terms of his ability to do it and I think sometimes that’s where attendance can play a massive role, is the more you attend the more it gives you the confidence to know, you know, I’m not going to know all the answers however it’s knowing how you can use your community to help you find the answers or you know knowing that if you don’t know the answer that’s not the end of the world like we were saying about not reading the papers, you know, if you haven’t been able to read the paper that week for whatever reason you might not know all the answers but the idea is that you come into a community where you can seek answers from each other, you can sort of look at shared understanding, it might even shape your understanding of what you read later, so sort of looking at different perspectives, different ideas is actually a really rich sort of, outcome from attending I think.

Heather Taylor (00:53:53)

Rashaad, starting with you then, based on your experience, what advice would you give to colleagues who are also working to support student attendance?

Rashaad Shabab

We really need to be clear about why we think attendance is a good idea, but also I think it’s very tempting sometimes to draw from our own experiences in a way that doesn’t necessarily resonate with students. I think there is, an issue of selection, shall we say, in who becomes a university lecturer or professor or something like that. We do tend to be people who are academically inclined sort of from the get-go, and the way that we see things isn’t necessarily the way our students see things. Many of my colleagues are brilliant and have been brilliant their whole lives, and that’s why they’re at the top of their profession. That’s why they’re the star researchers, and that’s why they’re at, you know, the University of Sussex. Right?

My journey has been somewhat more mixed. I have endured success, failure, difficulty, impediments, and all of that. Most of my impediments, I have to say, were of my own making. Right? But I had to overcome them nevertheless. And I think that what really helped me connect with students was reflecting on those impediments that I myself faced and how it sort of, you know, I’m still the same person, but I show up. What was it that stopped me from showing up? I know what that fear feels like. I know what those sweaty palms when someone asks you sort of a simple derivative and you don’t know what it is and you have to answer it in front of a class. And I know what it’s like to then be terrified of that and not go back to class.

So I would ask colleagues to potentially consider, the student point of view about, well, what might it be like for someone who, and let’s not jump to judgment about people’s effort or intent. I think, very often, what – one of the things I learned, as the Director of Student Experience for the Business School doing these SSPPs was just how varied and difficult it can be to be a young person today, to be a student today, to be, from a different background. Right? From various different backgrounds today. I think the cross section of human experience that our students represent is incredibly wide and incredibly rich, but within that, there’s also a great deal of lived experience that is genuinely difficult. People genuinely overcome significant obstacles that I would not have imagined had I not been in that role. I don’t think I’ll ever look at a classroom the same way again because before where I saw a student who comes in 5 minutes late and sits in the back corner and doesn’t contribute, I would judge them in a particular way. But now having met that student at an SSPP, understanding what she’d been through, understanding what had happened to her, and understanding what it took for her to continue to set foot on this campus and show up in that room, it’s been transformational. And that’s one student, but each of those 282 students I met you know, we met that year, each of them has a significant barrier. Right? Something significant they had to overcome. Some are more legitimate than others. Right? There’s a handful within that that we might say, well, actually, you really just need to, you know, show up and do less of whatever else it is you’re doing. Right? But, but overall, nobody signs up to come to university, goes into a massive amount of debt, and then chooses not to use it. Right?

So I would ask people to approach this knowing what the limits of our knowledge are, knowing that we don’t know what’s happening in each particular situation. We shouldn’t extrapolate too much from our own lived experience because there’s a danger with that, and extending, sort of support, extending offers of help. Now sometimes you do need to say that there are consequences if this doesn’t happen. But it can be helpful to say I’m here to help you avoid those consequences, but if you don’t take my help and you don’t do something about this those consequences will come for you nevertheless. But putting ourself in a position of someone who’s there to support and help students, and I think the vast majority of my colleagues would think of themselves, in that way. So I’d ask them to lean into that instinct.

Heather Taylor  

Yeah. I think as well, I think it’s really important not only to I guess, like, your suggestion really is we should rather than assuming students can’t be bothered, and that’s why they’re not coming, it’s good to give them the benefit of the doubt and acknowledge all of the things that we don’t know. But I think it’s also important for us definitely, I need to remind myself of this sometimes, to recognise, like, my sort of knee jerk reaction to being, you know, putting a lot of work, a lot of effort into something, and then being offended or hurt by an empty room. Well, not empty, but, you know. You have to be kind to yourself because you’re a human too, right, it’s not just about being kind to the students. But I think acknowledging that, oh, hang on a minute. I’m interpreting something here that means that I have – either they can’t be bothered and they’ve failed me or, and/or I have failed them in some way because if I haven’t done a good enough job, they’re not engaging because my content isn’t engaging enough or you know what I mean? It’s really easy to get into those little, the same as with the students that, oh, I’ve missed this. Everyone’s going to think I’m stupid. They’re going to ask me questions. I’m not going to know the answer. All the students who miss sessions always seem to think that there’s these fantastic friendship groups that exist within the seminar that literally do not. Like, they all talk to each other and are fine, but it’s not like they’re this really bonded group. You know? But a lot of the students that miss sessions make those assumptions. But I think it’s easy for us as the teachers to make our own assumptions about ourselves and the situation. So, yeah, I think that’s also really important to, remember.

Jeanette Ashton

I agree with all of those points. I think just as well as just some sort of basic things, just be personable you know how we are is so important which is kind of what you’ve both said so I think you know being personable, being encouraging, all of that but still have boundaries because we’re still you know professionals at the end of the day but just being yeah something that they want to come and you know and spend some time with.

I think as well it all comes down to building an enabling environment and that might be the way the classrooms are structured, so the module that I’ve talked about the Professional Skills module it’s all cafe style you know, it’s small tables and I think that works better for everything because if students are feeling oh they haven’t prepared enough etcetera and they’re sitting around in a horseshoe and everyone’s staring at you they’re not going to want to speak but if you’ve got them in small groups and you can sort of, you know, listen to what they’re saying and then you’re not you’re not picking on someone you’ve heard somebody oh Wendy I heard you say that that was a really interesting point would you mind sharing it, that’s more enabling than everyone sitting around in a horseshoe and you zoning in on someone so I think there’s some real basic things that everybody can do and, you know, it’s just an ongoing process isn’t it trying to get students along and hopefully the more they come the more they see the value and you get a kind of virtuous circle.

Wendy Garnham (01:02:34)

That’s an important point actually about the sort of, the arrangement of the class because I think those sort of horseshoe arrangements or you know the lined up desks like an exam, I think students feel sometimes when they come into that room that the spotlight is going to be on them you know and I mean it’s there’s a well-known phenomenon the spotlight effect which is this feeling that everybody is looking at you when in fact people probably spend far less attention on you as an individual than they do on themselves and their own contribution, you know people are thinking about their own sort of position within the group more.

But I do think that one of the things certainly that I found has helped that sense of sort of a more relaxed atmosphere in the class is if you give them something to look at or to work on or something to focus on so that you’re avoiding that spotlight effect so you know when they’re talking they’re talking with something in front of them or you’re getting them to do something with something in front of them rather than just that sort of bland asking questions where they sort of suddenly think oh the spotlights are on me, everybody’s looking at me, oh now I’ve forgotten what I was going to say, you know that sort of stressy environment, I think that’s one of the things that I think is really, I mean it’s still not a foolproof method but I think it helps to contribute to that sort of relaxed atmosphere and just making it fun as well I think you know if you if you have a sort of a fun sort of session then I think that does draw students to want to attend. Learning should be fun.

Heather Taylor

I would like to thank our guests Jeanette and Rashaad.

All

Thank you for having us.

Heather Taylor

So good. And thank you for listening. Goodbye. This has been the Learning Matters podcast from the University of Sussex created by Sarah Watson, Wendy Garnham, and Heather Taylor, and produced by Simon Overton. For more episodes, as well as articles, blogs, case studies, and infographics, please visit blogs.sussex.ac.uk forward /learning-matters.

Tagged with:
Posted in Podcast

Scaffolded self-assessment in foundation-year lab reports: Building evaluative judgement one section at a time.

Jon Powell (Assistant Professor in Engineering)

Photo by Aaron Santelices on Unsplash

Every autumn, around thirty foundation-year students in our department write five laboratory reports in sequence. For years the pattern was the same — a careful Report 1, careful written feedback, a Report 2 that looked almost identical, and a cohort average that had barely moved by Report 5. Students were doing what we asked, the feedback we returned was specific and thoughtful, and it still wasn’t working. 

Royce Sadler explained why over thirty years ago. Feedback can only improve a student’s work if they understand the standard being aimed for, can compare their current work against that standard, and can take some action to close the gap. A first-year student writing their first lab report has none of those things. They are new to the genre, they don’t yet know what a good report looks like, and comments arrive in a vocabulary they haven’t yet learned. I had been teaching the module as if my students arrived with the standard already in their heads, and I was wrong. 

What I changed was small in design. In Report 1, I now provide the results, discussion and conclusions sections as worked examples and students now write only one section — the summary. They then evaluate their own writing and my provided text against the same rubric. In Report 2 they take on the conclusions, in Report 3 the discussion section, and by Report 4 they write the whole thing independently. The writing load rises as their fluency in the genre rises. 

Alongside that, every report comes with a coversheet. Before I will accept it for marking, students have to identify strengths and points for improvement in their own work by reference to specific rubric criteria, cited by their code number. Vague self-praise — “this section was good” — does not pass. “Criterion 3.1.4 is met because…” does. The point is to force genuine engagement with the rubric at the level of named quality indicators, rather than as a general impression. Joanna Tai and colleagues call this evaluative judgement: the capacity to make informed decisions about the quality of one’s own work. 

I have now compared three cohorts before this change with three cohorts after, around 130 students in total. Overall, marks on the final report are up by roughly eight percentage points. What I had not expected was how unevenly the gains were distributed. Marks on the discussion sections rose by about fourteen percentage points and on the conclusions sections by about thirteen. Marks on the results section did not shift at all. 

On reflection, that is exactly what the theory predicts. Criterion-referenced self-assessment develops evaluative judgement, and evaluative judgement is what the discussion and conclusions sections demand. It does not develop the procedural skill the results section asks for — that is taught elsewhere, by a separate data-handling workshop common to all cohorts. The intervention is doing what it is designed to do, and only that. 

I should be honest about another finding. The picture at the individual student level is more contingent than the cohort averages suggest. Some students deepen their engagement with the coversheet across the term, become noticeably better calibrated about the quality of their own work, and lift their marks accordingly. Others disengage; their coversheets shrink to a line of perfunctory text and their self-scores drift further from mine over the term. The design creates the conditions for evaluative judgement to develop, but it does not compel it. 

Two design moves here are portable. The first — giving students worked examples to evaluate against the rubric before they have to produce their own — works in any subject with structured written assignments. A history module could provide a model paragraph of historiographical argument and ask students to apply the marking criteria to it before writing their own. A colleague convening a parallel laboratory module in our School has already adapted the approach and reports clearer first-submission reports as a result. The second move — that self-assessment must reference specific criteria by code — works anywhere a rubric exists. 

The cost of both, taken together, is one A4 sheet per submission. What I would say to anyone considering this is that the work is not in designing the scaffolding. It is in being patient enough not to abandon it when the middle reports of the sequence are harder for students, not easier, than the first. That is a feature of the design, not a failure of it. The recovery, and the gains on the sections that matter, come at the end. 

Further reading

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. 

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. 

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. 

About the author

Dr Jon Powell is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the University of Sussex, where he is Course Convenor for the Engineering Foundation Year and Head of Educational Enhancement. He is also the department’s Admissions Lead and Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) Accreditation Lead, and externally chairs accreditation panels for the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and sits on its Accreditation and Professional Formation Committee.

His scholarship of teaching and learning focuses on inclusive assessment, the academic outcomes of widening-participation students, and translating professional standards into everyday pedagogy. Before joining Sussex in 2022 he spent over a decade as a lecturer at Chulalongkorn University in Thailand. He is a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. 

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Blog

Sign up for the next Teaching and Learning with AI Community of Practice

AI generated image by Adobe Firefly 25th March 2026 using HM’s prompt “a room with groups of people at tables, discussing ideas” with settings art and doodle selected.

The next meeting of the University of Sussex ‘AI CoP’ will take place on 8th June, 1-3pm in the Library Teaching Room. This will be a salon-style event designed to provide opportunities to reflect on 25/26 and discuss your ideas, experiences and questions with each other. 

This event is open to all teaching colleagues at the University of Sussex and other interested colleagues.

We will meet in-person on the University Campus, exact venue tbc. Please register to attend here: Register to attend Teaching with AI Community of Practice – 8th June 2026 (in person). Completing the form is particularly useful for us to accommodate any access requirements.

You can read about previous AI CoP meetings on our, now retired, Educational Enhancement blog: https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/tel/category/ai-cop/ 

Subscribe to Learning Matters to receive future updates and/or join the Teaching and Learning with AI Community of Practice on Teams

Tagged with:
Posted in Events

Building an enabling environment: reflections on the inaugural year of the professional skills: law in action module

Jeanette Ashton & Dr Verona Ní Drisceoil

Jeanette Ashton is an Associate Professor in Law (Education and Scholarship) and a non-practising solicitor. She is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA), leads on Employability for Sussex Law School, and was an Oxford University Press (OUP) Law Teacher of the Year finalist in 2025.  

Dr Verona Ni Drisceoil is a Reader in Legal Education and a member of the Education Team at Sussex Law School. She is currently leading on Assessment Policy. She is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA), Co-Convenor of the International Connecting Legal Education Network and a Judge of the Oxford University Press (OUP) Law Teacher of the Year Award.

Introduction

In a higher education access and equity context, Thomas (2012; 2024) has long spoken about the importance of building an ‘enabling environment’ and a ‘whole provider’ approach for belonging, academic growth and retention. In this blog post, we draw on Thomas’ concept of building an enabling environment at modular level. Through deliberate design, thoughtful delivery and sustainable assessment we share how we have sought to build an enabling and empowering environment in a new Level 5 Professional Skills: Law in Action module (“the module”) at the University of Sussex. Informed by initial findings from a mixed methods study [C-REC Ref No: 2025-0205] exploring the impact of the module after a year, we consider three emerging themes: relationality, human flourishing, and sustainability. We do this to illustrate what can be achieved in a skills-based module of this kind specifically from a widening opportunity and employability standpoint but also to demonstrate what can be achieved in more traditional content focused modules. Ultimately, we argue that, in a world of generative AI, we must cultivate spaces and time for relationality, human flourishing, and more active and experiential learning. In essence, we must make the time we have with our students, in the classroom, count.

Why introduce a Professional Skills module?

Facilitating professional skills development in a legal education context is not new and has been a priority for some time. It was, for example, a key strand of the UK Legal Education and Training Review in 2013. At Sussex Law School, we run a suite of co-curricular activities including client interviewing, negotiation, mooting (arguing a case in a court-like setting), and mediation. These are all designed to give students exposure to a range of professional legal skills. Participating students benefit greatly, not only from the specific skills development aspect, but from the opportunity to network with local practitioners, who support the activities. Additionally, our final year Clinical Legal Education module (“CLE”) offers approximately 130 students the opportunity to work in an advisory capacity alongside practitioners in ‘Clinics’, providing free legal advice and public legal education to the local community. Again, the benefit to students is significant and includes gaining experience of practical legal work and the opportunity to work with practitioners, enhancing their employability.

However, with an average of 350 students per year group on the undergraduate law LLB programme, most students do not participate in either the co-curricular skills programmes or CLE. As Ashton and Basuita (in Millmore 2024; 262) note, a limitation of co-curricular skills programmes is that, unsurprisingly, it is often the most privileged students that put themselves forward. Those that already have significant social capital find it easier to navigate these opportunities. Students with caring responsibilities, those needing to work to support their studies, or commuting students may not be able to take part and therefore prioritise credit-bearing learning.

Our broad aim then was to develop a credit bearing module for students to develop a range of key professional and transferable skills, particularly those skills identified by our Employer Advisory Board. It was important for us to attract, and support, students unable to partake in our co-curricular offerings. In 2025/26, 55 students enrolled in this new second year optional module.

How did we design the module?

With skills development, active learning and widening opportunity as drivers, we took an innovative approach to the module design. Eschewing the traditional lecture/seminar format in law in favour of weekly two-hour workshops to allow for more experiential learning, the module included several innovative design features:

  • students work in ‘law firms’ complete with mission statement;
  • embedded oracy and presentation skills;
  • critical AI literacy;
  • Generative AI information literacy for the workplace;
  • weekly independent reflection through workshop ‘exit tickets’; and
  • career management.

For the generative AI information literacy for the workplace and career management workshops we worked in collaboration with colleagues from the Library and Careers and Entrepreneurship, Nick Heavey and Helen Gorman  respectively.

The ‘consultancy work’ feature

Particularly unique to the module is a block of embedded consultancy work whereby the students, in their ‘law firms’, work on live briefs over three weeks to conduct legal research for local community organisations. This year the students engaged in issues such as law of the shore, copyright, GDPR, defamation and mental health legislation.

Vivienne Smyth and Jessi-lorynne Smith from ‘Rights at Work’ law firm at the launch of Southwick Reef after presenting a paper on ‘Law of the Shore’ to the Sussex Marine and Coastal Forum, 28 January 2026. This opportunity came about following the embedded consultancy work in the module. Photograph shared with student consent.

‘Work in progress interview’ assessment

The module culminates in a live in person assessment framed as a ‘work in progress’ interview, whereby the ‘trainee lawyers’ explain their process for a piece of authentic legal drafting (Letter before Action) and showcase their suitability for a fictional newly qualified (NQ) solicitor role. In this respect, the assessment can be described as process oriented and sustainable. (Boud et.al., 2000). Sustainable assessment, for Boud, is assessment that ‘encompasses the abilities required to undertake activities that necessarily accompany learning throughout life in formal and informal settings’ (2000; 151). One student participant spoke directly to that sustainable aspect. They wrote:

“The Work in Progress interview was incredibly useful, as I really felt like I was in an interview for a real job offer. Therefore, I could practice my interview skills before I even start applying for training contracts.”

Emerging themes from the preliminary findings

Given the nature of the module, particularly the consultancy co-created aspect, we were keen to fully understand how our ‘trainee lawyers’ found the module and potential impacts and benefits for the collaborative partners (library and careers) and the community organisations who set the live ‘briefs’ for our students. The findings from the study will be developed in a fuller paper, alongside a practical toolkit, but for now we touch on three key themes emerging from the data.

1.    Community, belonging and relationality

Drawing from previous research in this area (see further Ní Drisceoil 2025), Hodgson’s “let’s get back to basics on belonging”, and Gravett’s work on relationality and ‘mattering’ (2023), we took deliberate steps to try (there is no guarantee) to cultivate an inclusive space to ensure everyone could connect and feel they belonged, and mattered, in this module. From an environmental standpoint (the physical ‘matters’ Gravett speaks about), the first step we took, in week 1, was to set up the teaching spaces in café style table groupings. Students were then tasked with ‘Set up your own Law Firm’, with complete mission statement and objectives. This week one task set the tone for the module. Every week students would sit together and work together in their ‘Law Firms’. Not only was this focus key from a building community perspective, but we were also cognisant of the need for the ‘trainee lawyers’ to establish good working relationships with their ‘colleagues’, which we felt would be essential for the success of the consultancy project.

Throughout the module, it was clear that the students valued forming connections with each other, and with us. As the module progressed, we had the sense of a steady growing of friendships, collegiality, and confidence, particularly, around voice work. This growing confidence was borne out in the study findings, with one student commenting on being “excited to come to class and learn” and another speaking to the group aspect and the opportunity for growth:

“Working in these groups was a great opportunity to learn from those in my group, develop my team skills and also further improve my presenting skills. It was refreshing to work in a setting where I wasn’t alone in a project, I had people to rehearse with, to give feedback to and advice. This made the whole project a lot more comfortable and allowed me to work to my best.”

2.    Human flourishing

Closely linked to investing in community and belonging, perhaps a consequence of it, is human flourishing and agency. Given the workshop design and focus of this module, we, as teachers, were not front and centre, but worked in a more facilitative role (see further Race, 2014). In active learning, as noted by Betts, rather than the teacher ‘transmitting’ knowledge through lectures or reading, learners engage in a series of activities which require them to produce observable evidence of their learning. Where possible, these individual, pair and group tasks should aim to develop higher order thinking skills, emotional connection with content and tactile or physical engagement with the environment’. Our role in essence was to guide, observe and nudge the ‘trainee lawyers’ working on tasks but in essence we deliberately allowed them to get on with it, make executive decisions together, disagree, discuss, and ultimately manage their own time. In this regard we drew on the work of Hall and Kerrigan who have argued persuasively for the need to “synthesise the doctrinal study of law with an exposure to the practical realities of the law”. A key feature of legal practice is working to a tight timeframe and getting a task ‘over the line’. Students told us they enjoyed how different the module was in this respect – where they had responsibility, and agency. This shift in power structures, focus and classroom dynamic was one they seemed to respond well to:

“This module was a great experience, and I learned a lot from it. It pushed me out of my comfort zone and helped me gain confidence through practical work and collaboration, which I found really valuable.”

3.  Sustainability

Finally, sustainability.  As per the work of Boud on (assessment) sustainability, the purpose of this module is to support students in developing transferable skills that they can use beyond university. We believe the skills and opportunities, and assessment, provided in this module are sustainable. The transferable skills focus is key here. Maranville argues that the ‘trade-off’ between traditional content, focusing on knowledge of substantive law, and increased experiential learning, is worth it. She suggests that the latter type of learning leads to better retention than that of content which is often lost after assessment.  (Maranville, 2001). With this in mind, we felt that being a second-year module, this was ideally placed as a ‘bridge’ between first year and final year and beyond. In short, we wanted the ‘trainee lawyers’ to draw on the substantive law they had been taught in first year for the practical legal tasks we set, and to develop the skills which would help them with both their future studies and as they apply for internships and employment. An example of drawing on prior learning is the final assessment (the in person ‘work in progress’ interview), where students were required to produce and respond to questions on a ‘letter of claim’, situated in the legal arena of contract law, which they had all studied in first year. Looking forward, alongside the key transferable skills of teamwork, communication, presentation and project management, in the ‘Information literacy for the workplace’ workshop and in the consultancy project, they undertook legal research on unfamiliar areas of law, many of which feature in final year optional modules. Our hope, therefore, is that the module’s impact, and particularly the assessment, goes beyond the 15 credits awarded. Students recognised this ‘value after university’ aspect:

“This approach created such valuable unique opportunities which will apply to life after university. Instead of just learning content we could grow our skills and replicate real life experience that we might face in the future. It was challenging at times, but the hard work was worth it, and in the end, I feel it has prepared us for our future careers.”

Concluding thoughts

Our experience, and the student reflections shared here, point to the value in building an enabling and empowering environment to help students connect with each other, us as teachers, and with the community outside of the university. Connection and relationality matters. The research also points to the powerful impact of active and experiential learning and providing meaningful insights into the realities of professional life, particularly for students that might not have the same opportunities. Whilst designing and delivering the module certainly required more time than a standard module, the experience of this first iteration has been a joyous endeavour and a teaching highlight for both of us; one where we were able to bring different skills, strengths and passions to the fore – and build meaningful connections with our students. Ultimately, we argue that, in a world of generative AI, we must cultivate spaces and time for relationality, human flourishing, and more active and experiential learning. As we said at the outset, make the time you have in the classroom with students count.

References

Ashton, J. & Basuita, P. (2024) ‘Professional Legal Skills: Building in and feeding forward – a client interviewing skills programme’ in Millmore, A. (ed) How to Include Employability in the Law School: Elgar, 253 to 264. 

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education22(2), 151–167.

Gravett, K. (2023). Relational Pedagogies: Connections and Mattering in Higher Education. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hall, J. & Kerrigan, K. (2011) ‘Clinic and the wider law curriculum’ International Journal of Clinical Legal Education (15) 25-37.

Hodgson, R. (2024). ‘Time to go back to basics on belonging’ (Wonkhe) available at https://wonkhe.com/blogs/time-to-go-back-to-basics-on- belonging/

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development: PTR Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Maranville, DA. (2001). ‘Infusing Passion and Context into the Traditional Curriculum through Experiential Learning’, Journal of Legal Education, 51(1) 51-74.

McConlogue, T. (2020). Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: UCL Press. 

Ní Drisceoil, V. (2025). Critiquing commitments to community and belonging in today’s law school: who does the labour? The Law Teacher, 59(2), 181–199.

Race, P. (2014) Making Learning Happen: 3rd edition, London: Sage.

Thomas, L. Final Report: ‘What Works?’ Students Retention and Success Programme: Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change (Paul Hamlyn Foundation/HEFCE/Higher Education Academy/Action on Access, 2012).

Thomas, L. (2024) ‘What is a whole provider approach to widening access and student success?’ (Wonkhe, 5 June 2024).

Webb, J., Ching, J., Maharg, P. & Sherr, A. Setting Standards: The Future of Legal Services Education and Training Regulation in England and Wales (Legal Education and Training Review 2013) available at www.letr.org.uk/the-report/index.html

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Articles

About this blog

Learning Matters provides a space for multiple and diverse forms of writing about teaching and learning at Sussex. We welcome contributions from staff as well as external collaborators. All submissions are assigned to a reviewer who will get in touch to discuss next steps. Find out more on our About page.

Please note that blog posts reflect the information and perspectives at the time of publication.

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts.